Academic Year 2023/24
INDIVIDUAL COURSEWORK
Term Jan 2023 - May 2024
Module Leader
Name: Altaf Khoso
Email: A.Khoso@uel.ac.uk
Room: DL4.01
Student Hours: Monday 11-1200hrs
Tuesday 11-1300hrs
Further can be requested or Online
Co- Module Leader
Name: Syed Naqavi
Email: S.Naqavi2@uel.ac.uk
Room: DL4.01
Student Hours: TBD
INDIVIDUAL COURSEWORK
1
Executive Summary
Managing finance is an important function in fulfilling the financial requirements of the
business and tracking performance to make informed decisions. A report regarding revenue
and spending variance is presented to reflect the difference in actual and budgeted value. The
report examined the financial performance of Coffee Shack to analyse the gross and net profit
margins. A CVP analysis has been presented to evaluate the cost structure of the business and
identify the optimum production level. The comparison of Proposal 1 and Proposal 2 of Coffee
Shack with the implication of NPV, ARR, IRR, and PBP analyse the suitability of Proposal 1
which provides high returns and develops profitability. The sustainable profitability develops
the financial performance of Coffee Shack to ensure long-term operation. Further, the use of
debt securities and equity financing is considered a suitable source of finance. Overall making
viable investment decisions and functioning operations helps to achieve long-term growth for
the business.
INDIVIDUAL COURSEWORK
2
Table of Contents
1. Introduction............................................................................................................................ 4
2. Revenue and spending variance.............................................................................................4
2.1 Preparation of a spending variance of Coffee Shack for January 2024...........................4
2.2 Possible reasons behind variances....................................................................................5
2.2 Objectives of Budgeting and its Benefits for Coffee Shack.............................................5
3. Evaluation of the income statement of Coffee Shack............................................................5
3.1 Computation of contribution and importance of Break-even sales..................................5
3.1.1 Contribution calculation............................................................................................5
3.1.2 Relevance of break-even sale....................................................................................5
3.2 Calculation of profitability ratios.....................................................................................6
3.3 Evaluation of the viability of the proposal due to the changes in sales and direct materials
................................................................................................................................................6
3.4 Explanation of results and benefits of Cost volume profit (CVP) analysis.....................7
4. Investment appraisal techniques.............................................................................................7
4.1 Merits of each Investment Appraisal Technique..............................................................7
4.1.1 Net Present Value (NPV)..........................................................................................7
4.1.2 Accounting Rate of Return (ARR)............................................................................7
4.1.3 Internal Rate of Return (IRR)....................................................................................8
4.1.4 Payback Period (PBP)............................................................................................... 8
4.2 Recommendation for the management of Coffee Shack based on the above techniques 8
5. Advising on profitability and sustainability and sources of finance......................................9
5.1 Explanation of terms........................................................................................................9
5.1.1 Profitability................................................................................................................9
5.1.2 Financial Sustainability............................................................................................. 9
5.2 Suggestion for potential sources of finance...................................................................10
5.3 Advice on measures for the attainment of sustainability by Coffee Shack....................10
INDIVIDUAL COURSEWORK
3
6. Conclusion............................................................................................................................11
References................................................................................................................................ 12
Bibliography.............................................................................................................................14
INDIVIDUAL COURSEWORK
4
1. Introduction
Evaluation of financial statements provides meaningful insights about the overall performance
of a business. The purpose of this report is to evaluate the performance of Coffee Shack,
through different profitability ratios. A budget and spending variance report is made to compare
the actual and the forecasted financial values over a specific year. Different investment
appraisal techniques such as NPV, PBB, IRR and ARR have been used to determine the long-
term profitability of two proposals in the context of the expansion of 10 potential business sites.
The overall report deals with financial and non-financial aspects such as profitability and
sustainability of the business in a comprehensive manner.
2. Revenue and spending variance
2.1 Preparation of a spending variance of Coffee Shack for January 2024
Table 1: Revenue and Spending variance
The revenue and spending variance report of Coffee Shack is provided to reflect the ability of
the firm in terms of forecasting potential income and expenses. Table 1 above shows a
comprehensive overview of the budgeted and actual figures of revenue and operating expenses
which may be beneficial for the business to improve decision-making and control costs.
INDIVIDUAL COURSEWORK
5
2.2 Possible reasons behind variances
A significant increment of 13.50% is observed within the actual and budgeted revenue of
Coffee Shack in 2024. The key reason for this increase can be attributed to the rising high foot
traffic because most of the coffee chains are located on high streets and shopping centres.
Additionally, the enhancement in raw materials depends on the rising ingredient price. For
instance, in the last two years, the Coffee Price in the UK rose by 26% because the food outlets
experienced the highest inflation (Ungoed-Thomas, 2022). Apart from this, wages and salaries,
utilities and repair and maintenance reflect a hike due to increased staff members, energy
consumption and equipment breakdown respectively.
2.2 Objectives of Budgeting and its Benefits for Coffee Shack
Budgeting is useful for planning and setting financial goals for an organisation by outlining
anticipated income and expenses (Schmidt, 2023). A robust budgetary plan may be beneficial
for Coffee Shack in terms of achieving financial stability while ensuring the requirement of
adequate cash flow. Additionally, a budgetary plan identifies potential financial and non-
financial risks for an organisation (Nilsson et al., 2022). For instance, Coffee Shack may utilise
its budgeting plan to evaluate the potential risks associated with its investment in potential
business expansion in 10 additional sites.
3. Evaluation of the income statement of Coffee Shack
3.1 Computation of contribution and importance of Break-even sales
3.1.1 Contribution calculation
Table 2: Computation of Contribution
3.1.2 Relevance of break-even sale
Break-even sales determine the amount in which a product is to be sold in terms of covering
the overall cost of production (Sintha, 2020). In this case, determining the break-even sale for
Coffee Shack is crucial to determine the allocation of different overheads within the
INDIVIDUAL COURSEWORK
6
manufacturing process. This would be beneficial for the company to utilise the optimum level
of resources in terms of generating profit.
3.2 Calculation of profitability ratios
Table 3: Profitability Ratios
Figure 1: Profitability ratios of Coffee Shack
The net profit ratio of Coffee Shack indicates that the company has efficiently managed its
operational expenses and generated profit at the end of the year [Refer to Figure 1].
Additionally, the GPM is significantly higher for Coffee Shack indicating the generation of a
substantial portion of sales after considering the direct cost of production [Refer to table 3].
Overall, the profitability of the business shows a sound position and potential growth in future.
3.3
Evaluation of the viability of the proposal due to the changes in sales and direct
materials
The proposal has been evaluated based on the assumption that 35% of 70,000 for direct
materials is considered focused on meal deals. However, the proposal is not viable for Coffee
Shack because it would not generate a profit at the end of the year hence, it needs to be rejected.
INDIVIDUAL COURSEWORK
7
3.4 Explanation of results and benefits of Cost volume profit (CVP) analysis
Table 4: CVP analysis
According to the CVP analysis, Coffee Shack needs to sell 3 units to cover the overall fixed
costs and a MOS of 1 indicates that if the sale of the business declines, then it can lead to a
loss [Refer to Table 4]. CVP analysis can be beneficial for an organisation to set realistic
financial targets and budgets (Lulaj and Iseni, 2018). Coffee Shack has managed to identify its
cost structure through this approach including its optimum level of production level.
4. Investment appraisal techniques
4.1 Merits of each Investment Appraisal Technique
4.1.1 Net Present Value (NPV)
Net Present Value (NPV) is the most viable technique of investment appraisal that analyses the
difference between present value cash inflows and outflows over a specific period. Further, this
technique is beneficial to ascertain the profitability of the potential project while considering
the time value of money approach to estimate the present value of future cash flows (Wieloch,
2019). Therefore, this technique is significant for Coffee Shack to analyse the suitability of the
proposal.
4.1.2 Accounting Rate of Return (ARR)
Accounting Rate of Return (ARR) measures the expected return from the initial investment
value to undertake viable capital budgeting decisions. Additionally, ARR helps identify the
average profit from the potential investment and compares multiple projects to select the most
appropriate one based on high returns (Mollah, Rouf and Rana, 2021). In this way, to compare
INDIVIDUAL COURSEWORK
8
proposals 1 and 2 of Coffee Shack, ARR provides a better understanding of the high-return
investment. Thus, the high rate of return maximises the profitability of investment decisions
and improves financial position.
4.1.3 Internal Rate of Return (IRR)
Internal Rate of Return (IRR) is the technique used to estimate the rate of return from
investment decisions. The merit of IRR is to compare different projects based on the return and
compare it to the NPV method as an indicator of efficiency (Mellichamp, 2017). In this way,
Coffee Shack has received the benefit of analysing the potential cash flows generated by the
investment and measuring its credibility. Hence, this technique is viable for making profitable
investment decisions for the business to predict the return capacity of the potential project.
4.1.4 Payback Period (PBP)
Payback Period (PBP) is the method that estimates the length of time involved to cover the
investment value of the project and analyse the risk associated with the project. The benefit of
PBP is to predict the time frame for assessing risk and return generation capacity while
covering the cost of investment (Silva et al., 2019). Thus, Coffee Shack measures the period
involved to cover the initial value of the proposal through PBP for measuring risk and return
factors to make informed decisions.
4.2 Recommendation for the management of Coffee Shack based on the above
techniques
INDIVIDUAL COURSEWORK
9
Table 5: Calculation of NPV, ARR, IRR, and PBP
Table 5 indicates the high NPV and ARR of Proposal 1 of Coffee Shack although the value of
IRR is similar to Proposal 2 and PBP is higher. High NPV ensures improved profitability from
the investment value to maximise the returns and develop cash flows (Zhang, 2022). In this
way, to consider the time value of money concept in NPV analyse its suitability to undertake
viable investment decisions also high ARR develop the profitability. Thus, Proposal 1 is
suitable for the business to provide high NPV and ARR of £10,891.74 and 28.43% respectively
although Proposal 2 involves £9,997.52 and 27.30% respectively. Overall, the high returns
indicate the efficiency of proposal 1 of Coffee Shack to grow the business.
5. Advising on profitability and sustainability and sources of finance
5.1 Explanation of terms
5.1.1 Profitability
Profitability refers to the measure which focuses on the profit-earning capacity of an enterprise
through its operational activities. Arai and Hirota (2023), described profitability as a well-
known tool for the evaluation performance of a company via return on sales, equity and assets.
Thus, it is an important metric for the assessment of the operational effectiveness of businesses
by revenue-generating capability.
5.1.2 Financial Sustainability
Financial sustainability for corporate entities incorporates the activities for conducting
businesses with a focus on earning profits to meet all expenses and generate profit. This
INDIVIDUAL COURSEWORK
10
approach prioritises association with sufficient capital returns to overcome risks of insolvency
with condition-based investment strategies (Gleißner, Günther and Walkshäusl, 2022). Hence,
sustainability allows companies to enjoy monetary stability with efficient cost management
and risk management outlook.
5.2 Suggestion for potential sources of finance
The major sources of finance for Coffee Shack to fund the selected proposal include equity
financing and debt securities. Equity financing is a beneficial source as it avoids the payment
of interest allowing businesses to reinvest cash flows for corporate growth (CFI, 2024). Thus,
this source is appropriate for the enterprise due to the absence of repayment obligations
increasing the strength of its capital structure. Lestari and Indarto (2021), addressed that debt
securities offer a cheap source of finance as they reduce interest costs and improve operational
performance through optimum issuances. Hence, debt securities are
useful for Coffee Shack to
raise funds at a low cost increasing the potential profitability of Proposal 1 with an IRR of 10%.
Therefore, equity financing and debt securities have been considered appropriate for the
company to avoid repayment obligations and high costs.
5.3 Advice on measures for the attainment of sustainability by Coffee Shack
The corporate sustainability theory concentrates on the development of a holistic business
model with enhanced efforts on environmental, social and governance activities for increased
financial stability with sustainability (Kantabutra and Ketprapakorn, 2020). Figure 2 reflects
the importance of sustainability vision and values for the achievement of corporate
sustainability performance. Therefore, it is advised that Coffee Shack focus on establishing
sustainability goals, energy conservation and stakeholder engagement to strengthen its
sustainability approach. The other advised measures revolve around the hosting of
sustainability workshops, using biodegradable materials and prioritising recycling.
INDIVIDUAL COURSEWORK
11
Figure 2: Components of Corporate Sustainability Theory
(Source: Kantabutra and Ketprapakorn, 2020)
6. Conclusion
Based on the above evaluation it has been found that budgeting offers benefits of effective
planning, risk monitoring and goal establishment for Coffee Shack. The break-even sale is also
found to be beneficial for the utilisation of the optimum level of resources in an enterprise.
Considering the investment appraisal techniques Proposal 1 is considered the most profitable
for Coffee Shack with the highest NPV. It is recommended that the company increase
stakeholder engagement, establish sustainability goals and use biodegradable materials for the
attainment of sustainability.
INDIVIDUAL COURSEWORK
12
References
Arai, R. and Hirota, S. (2023) ‘Profitability or Longevity? Cross-Country Variations in
Corporate Performance,’ Sustainability, 15(10), pp. 8307–8307. doi:
https://doi.org/10.3390/su15108307. (Accessed: 30 April 2024).
CFI (2024) Equity Financing, Corporate Finance Institute. Available at:
https://corporatefinanceinstitute.com/resources/valuation/equity-financing/
#:~:text=The%20main%20advantage%20of%20equity (Accessed: 2 May 2024).
Gleißner, W., Günther, T. and Walkshäusl, C. (2022) ‘Financial sustainability: measurement
and empirical evidence’, Journal of Business Economics, 92(3), pp. 467–516. doi:
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-022-01081-0. (Accessed: 29 April 2024).
Kantabutra, S. and Ketprapakorn, N. (2020) ‘Toward a theory of corporate sustainability: A
theoretical integration and exploration’, Journal of Cleaner Production, 270. doi:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122292. (Accessed: 27 April 2024).
Lestari, R. I. and Indarto, I. (2021) ‘The Relationship Between Debt Securities Issuance and
Operational Performance: An Empirical Study of Banks in Indonesia’, The Journal of Asian
finance, economics, and business/The Journal of Asian finance, economics and business, 8(6),
pp. 731–740. doi: https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2021.vol8.no6.0731. (Accessed: 28 April
2024).
Mellichamp, D. A. (2017) ‘Internal rate of return: Good and bad features, and a new way of
interpreting the historic measure’, Computers & Chemical Engineering, 106, pp. 396–406. doi:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2017.06.005. (Accessed: 26 April 2024).
Mollah, Md. A. S., Rouf, Md. A. and Rana, S. M. S. (2021) ‘A study on capital budgeting
practices of some selected companies in Bangladesh’, PSU Research Review, 7(2). doi:
https://doi.org/10.1108/prr-10-2020-0035. (Accessed: 27 April 2024).
Nilsson, B. et al. (2022) Financial institutions and nonfinancial risk: How corporates build
resilience | McKinsey, www.mckinsey.com. www.mckinsey.com. Available at:
https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/risk-and-resilience/our-insights/financial-institutions-
and-nonfinancial-risk-how-corporates-build-resilience (Accessed: 2 May 2024).
INDIVIDUAL COURSEWORK
13
Schmidt, J. (2023) Budgeting, Corporate Finance Institute. Corporatefinanceinstitute.com.
Available at: https://corporatefinanceinstitute.com/resources/fpa/budgeting/ (Accessed: 2 May
2024).
Silva, G. S. et al. (2019) ‘Benefit-cost analysis to estimate the payback time and the economic
value of two Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae elimination methods in breeding herds’, Preventive
Veterinary Medicine, 168, pp. 95–102. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2019.04.008.
(Accessed: 26 April 2024).
Sintha, L. (2020) ‘IMPORTANCE OF BREAK-EVEN ANALYSIS FOR THE MICRO,
SMALL AND MEDIUM ENTERPRISES’, International Journal of Research
-GRANTHAALAYAH, 8(6), pp. 212–218. doi:
https://doi.org/10.29121/granthaalayah.v8.i6.2020.502. (Accessed: 28 April 2024).
Ungoed-Thomas, J. (2022) UK restaurant and coffee prices rise by up to 26% in two years, the
Guardian. www.theguardian.com. Available at:
https://www.theguardian.com/business/2022/nov/05/uk-restaurant-and-coffee-prices-rise-by-
up-to-26-in-two-years (Accessed: 2 May 2024).
Wieloch, H. G. (2019) ‘Project Net Present Value Estimation under Uncertainty’, Central
European Journal of Operations Research, 27(1), pp. 179–197. doi:
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10100-017-0500-0. (Accessed: 29 April 2024).
Zhang, Y. (2022) ‘Comparison of Net Present Value Model and Internal Rate of Return Model
in Investment Decisions’, BCP Business & Management, 30, pp. 502–507. doi:
https://doi.org/10.54691/bcpbm.v30i.2494. (Accessed: 1 May 2024).
INDIVIDUAL COURSEWORK
14
Bibliography
Alkaraan, F. (2017) ‘Strategic Investment Appraisal: Multidisciplinary Perspectives’,
Advances in Mergers and Acquisitions, pp. 67–82. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/s1479-
361x20170000016004 (Accessed: 2 May 2024).
Kwon, H. and Kang, C. W. (2019) ‘Improving Project Budget Estimation Accuracy and
Precision by Analyzing Reserves for Both Identified and Unidentified Risks’, Project
Management Journal, 50(1), pp. 86–100. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/8756972818810963
(Accessed: 1 May 2024).
Lynn, T. and Rosati, P. (2020) ‘New Sources of Entrepreneurial Finance’, Digital
Entrepreneurship, pp. 209–231. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53914-6_11
(Accessed: 30 April 2024).
Maka, B. and Suresh, N. (2018) ‘Review of Financial Performance analysis of Corporate
Organizations’, Asian Journal of Management, 9(1), p. 500. doi: https://doi.org/10.5958/2321-
5763.2018.00078.1 (Accessed: 29 April 2024).
Mathew, S. (2024) ‘An Overview on Capital Investment’. doi:
https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202404.0987.v1 (Accessed: 2 May 2024).
Mucci, D. M., Frezatti, F. and Bido, D. de S. (2021) ‘Enabling design characteristics and budget
usefulness’, RAUSP Management Journal, ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print). doi:
https://doi.org/10.1108/rausp-04-2019-0058 (Accessed: 1 May 2024).
Tirumalsety, R. and Gurtoo, A. (2019) ‘Financial sources, capital structure and performance of
social enterprises: empirical evidence from India’, Journal of Sustainable Finance &
Investment, pp. 1–20. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2019.1619337. (Accessed: 28
April 2024).
Ziarko, A. R. (2020) ‘Profitability Ratios in Risk Analysis’, Contemporary Trends and
Challenges in Finance, pp. 77–88. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43078-8_7
(Accessed: 1May 2024).