Study Muddy
Study Muddy

Upload, organize, preview, and share study documents from one clean workspace.

Explore

BrowseAbout UsContact Us

Workspace

UploadDashboard

Legal

Privacy PolicyTerms & ConditionsDisclaimerReport Copyright & Abuse
Study Muddy
PDF·0% (0)·0 views·18 pages

Lecture 29: Uniqueness Theorem in Electromagnetic Field Theory

Lecture notes on the uniqueness theorem in electromagnetic field theory, covering Maxwell’s equations, boundary conditions, lossy media, and antenna radiation.

Category: Engineering

Uploaded by Danielle Mercer on Apr 21, 2026

Copyright

© All Rights Reserved

We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.

Available Formats

Download as PDF or TXT.

Download PDF
/ 18
100%
18

Document text

Lecture 29

Uniqueness Theorem

29.1 Uniqueness Theorem

The uniqueness of a solution to a linear system of equations is an important concept in

mathematics. Under certain conditions, ordinary differential equation partial differential

equation and matrix equations will have unique solutions. But uniqueness is not always

guaranteed as we shall see. This issue is discussed in many math books and linear algebra

books [69, 81]. The prove of uniqueness for Laplace and Poisson equations are given in

[29, 48] which is slightly different for electrodynamic problems. In this section, we will prove

uniqueness theorem for electrodynamic problems [31, 34, 47, 59, 75]. First, let us assume that

there exist two solutions in the presence of one set of common impressed sources Ji and Mi.

Namely, these two solutions are Ea, Ha, Eb, Hb. Both of them satisfy Maxwell’s equations

and the same boundary conditions. Are Ea = Eb, Ha = Hb?

To study the uniqueness theorem, we consider general linear anisotropic inhomogeneous

media, where the tensors μ and ε can be complex so that lossy media can be included, it

follows that

∇ × Ea = −jωμ · Ha − Mi (29.1.1)

∇ × Eb = −jωμ · Hb − Mi (29.1.2)

∇ × Ha = jωε · Ea + Ji (29.1.3)

∇ × Hb = jωε · Eb + Ji (29.1.4)

By taking the difference of these two solutions, we have

∇ × (Ea − Eb) = −jωμ · (Ha − Hb) (29.1.5)

∇ × (Ha − Hb) = jωε · (Ea − Eb) (29.1.6)

Or alternatively, defining δE = Ea − Eb and δH = Ha − Hb, we have

∇ × δE = −jωμ · δH (29.1.7)

∇ × δH = jωε · δE (29.1.8)

291

292 Electromagnetic Field Theory

The difference solutions satisfy the original source-free Maxwell’s equations.

By taking the left dot product of δH∗ with (29.1.7), and then the left dot product of δE∗

with the complex conjugation of (29.1.8), we obtain

δH∗ · ∇ × δE = −jωδH∗ · μ · δH

δE · ∇ × δH∗ = −jωδE · ε∗ · δE∗ (29.1.9)

Now, taking the difference of the above, we get

δH∗ · ∇ × δE − δE · ∇ × δH∗ = ∇ · (δE × δH∗)

= −jωδH∗ · μ · δH + jωδE · ε∗ · δE∗ (29.1.10)

Figure 29.1: Geometry for proving the uniqueness theorem. We like to know the boundary

conditions needed on S in order to guarantee the uniqueness of the solution in V .

Next, integrating the above equation over a volume V bounded by a surface S as shown

in Figure 29.1. Two scenarios are possible: one that the volume V contains the impressed

sources, and two, that the sources are outside the volume V . After making use of Gauss’

divergence theorem, we arrive at



V

∇ · (δE × δH∗)dV =



S

(δE × δH∗) · dS

=



V

[−jωδH∗ · μ · δH + jωδE · ε∗ · δE∗]dV (29.1.11)

And next, we would like to know the kind of boundary conditions that would make the

left-hand side equal to zero. It is seen that the surface integral on the left-hand side will be

Uniqueness Theorem 293

zero if:1

1. If ˆn × E is specified over S so that ˆn × Ea = ˆn × Eb, then ˆn × δE = 0 or the PEC boundary

condition for δE, and then2

S (δE × δH∗) · ˆndS = S (ˆn × δE) · δH∗dS = 0.

2. If ˆn × H is specified over S so that ˆn × Ha = ˆn × Hb, then ˆn × δH = 0 or the PMC

boundary condition for δH, and then

S (δE × δH∗) · ˆndS = − S (ˆn × δH∗) · δEdS = 0.

3. If ˆn × E is specified over S1, and ˆn × H is specified over S2 (where S1 ∪ S2 = S), then

ˆn × δE = 0 (PEC boundary condition) on S1, and ˆn × δH = 0 (PMC boundary condition)

on S2, then the left-hand side becomes

S (δE × δH∗) · ˆndS = 

S1 + 

S2 = 

S1 (ˆn × δE) · δH∗dS

− 

S2 (ˆn × δH∗) · δEdS = 0.

Thus, under the above three scenarios, the left-hand side of (29.1.11) is zero, and then

the right-hand side of (29.1.11) becomes



V

[−jωδH∗ · μ · δH + jωδE · ε∗ · δE∗]dV = 0 (29.1.12)

For lossless media, μ and ε are hermitian tensors (or matrices3), then it can be seen, using

the properties of hermitian matrices or tensors, that δH∗ · μ · δH and δE · ε∗ · δE∗ are purely

real. Taking the imaginary part of the above equation yields



V

[−δH∗ · μ · δH + δE · ε∗ · δE∗]dV = 0 (29.1.13)

The above two terms correspond to stored magnetic field energy and stored electric field

energy in the difference solutions δH and δE, respectively. The above being zero does not

imply that δH and δE are zero.

For resonance solutions, the stored electric energy can balance the stored magnetic energy.

The above resonance solutions are those of the difference solutions satisfying PEC or PMC

boundary condition or mixture thereof. Therefore, δH and δE need not be zero, even though

(29.1.13) is zero. This happens when we encounter solutions that are the resonant modes of

the volume V bounded by surface S.

Uniqueness can only be guaranteed if the medium is lossy as shall be shown later. It is

also guaranteed if lossy impedance boundary conditions are imposed.4 First we begin with

the isotropic case.

1In the following, please be reminded that PEC stands for “perfect electric conductor”, while PMC stands

for “perfect magnetic conductor”. PMC is the dual of PEC. Also, a fourth case of impedance boundary

condition is possible, which is beyond the scope of this course. Interested readers may consult Chew, Theory

of Microwave and Optical Waveguides [75].

2Using the vector identity that a · (b × c) = c · (a × b) = b · (c × a).

3Tensors are a special kind of matrices.

4See Chew, Theory of Microwave and Optical Waveguides.

294 Electromagnetic Field Theory

29.1.1 Isotropic Case

It is easier to see this for lossy isotropic media. Then (29.1.12) simplifies to



V

[−jωμ|δH|2 + jωε∗|δE|2]dV = 0 (29.1.14)

For isotropic lossy media, μ = μ′ − jμ′′ and ε = ε′ − jε′′. Taking the real part of the above,

we have from (29.1.14) that



V

[−ωμ′′|δH|2 − ωε′′|δE|2]dV = 0 (29.1.15)

Since the integrand in the above is always negative definite, the integral can be zero only if

δE = 0, δH = 0 (29.1.16)

everywhere in V , implying that Ea = Eb, and that Ha = Hb. Hence, it is seen that uniqueness

is guaranteed only if the medium is lossy. The physical reason is that when the medium is

lossy, a pure time-harmonic solution cannot exist due to loss. The modes, which are the

source-free solutions of Maxwell’s equations, are decaying sinusoids.

Notice that the same conclusion can be drawn if we make μ′′ and ε′′ negative. This

corresponds to active media, and uniqueness can be guaranteed for a time-harmonic solution.

In this case, no time-harmonic solution exists, and the resonant solution is a growing sinusoid.

29.1.2 General Anisotropic Case

The proof for general anisotropic media is more complicated. For the lossless anisotropic

media, we see that (29.1.12) is purely imaginary. However, when the medium is lossy, this

same equation will have a real part. Hence, we need to find the real part of (29.1.12) for the

general lossy case.

About taking the Real and Imaginary Parts of a Complex Expression

To this end, we digress on taking the real and imaginary parts of a complex expression. Here,

we need to find the complex conjugate5 of (29.1.12), which is scalar, and add it to itself to

get its real part. The complex conjugate of the scalar

c = δH∗ · μ · δH

is6

c∗ = δH · μ∗ · δH∗ = δH∗ · μ† · δH

5Also called hermitian conjugate.

6To arrive at these expressions, one makes use of the matrix algebra rule that if D = A · B · C, then

Dt = Ct · Bt · At. This is true even for non-square matrices. But for our case here, A is a 1 × 3 row vector,

and C is a 3 × 1 column vector, and B is a 3 × 3 matrix. In vector algebra, the transpose of a vector is implied.

Also, in our case here, D is a scalar, and hence, its transpose is itself.

Uniqueness Theorem 295

Similarly, the complex conjugate of the scalar

d = δE · ε∗ · δE∗ = δE∗ · ε† · δE

is

d∗ = δE∗ · ε† · δE

Therefore,

=m (δH∗ · μ · δH) = 1

2j δH∗ · (μ − μ†) · δH

=m (δE · ε · δE∗) = 1

2j δE∗ · (ε − ε†) · δE

and similarly for the real part.

Finally, after taking the complex conjugate of the scalar quantity (29.1.12) and adding it

to itself, we have



V

[−jωδH∗ · (μ − μ†) · δH − jωδE∗ · (ε − ε†) · δE]dV = 0 (29.1.17)

For lossy media, −j(μ − μ†) and −j(ε − ε†) are hermitian negative matrices. Hence the

integrand is always negative definite, and the above equation cannot be satisfied unless δH =

δE = 0 everywhere in V . Thus, uniqueness is guaranteed in a lossy anisotropic medium.

Similar statement can be made as the isotropic case if the medium is active. Then the

integrand is positive definite, and the above equation cannot be satisfied unless δH = δE = 0

everywhere in V and hence, uniqueness is satisfied.

29.1.3 Hind Sight

The proof of uniqueness for Maxwell’s equations is very similar to the proof of uniqueness for

a matrix equation [69]

A · x = b (29.1.18)

If a solution to a matrix equation exists without excitation, namely, when b = 0, then the

solution is the null space solution [69], namely, x = xN . In other words,

A · xN = 0 (29.1.19)

These null space solutions exist without a “driving term” b on the right-hand side. For

Maxwell’s Equations, b corresponds to the source terms. They are like the homogeneous

solution of an ordinary differential equation or a partial differential equation [81]. In an

enclosed region of volume V bounded by a surface S, homogeneous solutions are the resonant

solutions of this Maxwellian system. When these solutions exist, they give rise to non-

uniqueness.

Also, notice that (29.1.7) and (29.1.8) are Maxwell’s equations without the source terms.

In a closed region V bounded by a surface S, only resonance solutions for δE and δH with

the relevant boundary conditions can exist when there are no source terms.

296 Electromagnetic Field Theory

As previoulsy mentioned, one way to ensure that these resonant solutions are eliminated

is to put in loss or gain. When loss or gain is present, then the resonant solutions are decaying

sinusoids or growing sinusoids. Since we are looking for solutions in the frequency domain,

or time harmonic solutions, we are only looking for the solution on the real ω axis on the

complex ω plane. These non-sinusoidal solutions are outside the solution space: They are

not part of the time-harmonic solutions we are looking for. Therefore, there are no resonant

null-space solutions.

29.1.4 Connection to Poles of a Linear System

The output to input of a linear system can be represented by a transfer function H(ω) [45,153].

If H(ω) has poles, and if the system is lossless, the poles are on the real axis. Therefore, when

ω = ωpole, the function H(ω) becomes undefined. This also gives rise to non-uniqueness of the

output with respect to the input. Poles usually correspond to resonant solutions, and hence,

the non-uniqueness of the solution is intimately related to the non-uniqueness of Maxwell’s

equations at the resonant frequencies of a structure. This is illustrated in the upper part of

Figure 29.2.

Figure 29.2: The non-uniqueness problem is intimately related to the locations of the poles

of a transfer function being on the real axis.

Uniqueness Theorem 297

If the input function is f (t), with Fourier transform F (ω), then the output y(t) is given

by the following Fourier integral, viz.,

y(t) = 1

2π

 ∞

−∞

dωejωtH(ω)F (ω) (29.1.20)

where the Fourier inversion integral path is on the real axis on the complex ω plane. The

Fourier inversion integral is undefined or non-unique.

However, if loss is introduced, these poles will move away from the real axis as shown

in the lower part of Figure 29.2. Then the transfer function is uniquely determined for all

frequencies on the real axis. In this way, the Fourier inversion integral in (29.1.20) is well

defined, and uniqueness of the solution is guaranteed.

29.1.5 Radiation from Antenna Sources

The above uniqueness theorem guarantees that if we have some antennas with prescribed

current sources on them, the radiated field from these antennas are unique. To see how this

can come about, we first study the radiation of sources into a region V bounded by a large

surface Sinf as shown in Figure 29.3 [34].

Even when ˆn × E or ˆn × H are specified on the surface at Sinf, the solution is nonunique

because the volume V bounded by Sinf, can have many resonant solutions. In fact, the

region will be replete with resonant solutions as one makes Sinf become very large. The way

to remove these resonant solutions is to introduce an infinitesimal amount of loss in region

V . Then these resonant solutions will disappear. Now we can take Sinf to infinity, and the

solution will always be unique.

Notice that if Sinf → ∞, the waves that leave the sources will never be reflected back

because of the small amount of loss. The radiated field will just disappear into infinity. This

is just what radiation loss is: power that propagate to infinity, but never to return. In fact,

one way of guaranteeing the uniqueness of the solution in region V when Sinf is infinitely large,

or that V is infinitely large is to impose the radiation condition: the waves that radiate to

infinity are outgoing waves only, and never do they return. This is also called the Sommerfeld

radiation condition [154]. Uniqueness of the field outside the sources is always guaranteed if

we assume that the field radiates to infinity and never to return. This is equivalent to solving

the cavity solutions with an infinitesimal loss, and then letting the size of the cavity become

infinitely large.

298 Electromagnetic Field Theory

Figure 29.3: The solution for antenna radiation is unique because we impose the Sommerfeld

radiation condition when seeking the solution. This is equivalent to assuming an infinitesimal

loss when seeking the solution in V .

Bibliography

[1] J. A. Kong, Theory of electromagnetic waves. New York, Wiley-Interscience, 1975.

[2] A. Einstein et al., “On the electrodynamics of moving bodies,” Annalen der Physik,

vol. 17, no. 891, p. 50, 1905.

[3] P. A. M. Dirac, “The quantum theory of the emission and absorption of radiation,” Pro-

ceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical

and Physical Character, vol. 114, no. 767, pp. 243–265, 1927.

[4] R. J. Glauber, “Coherent and incoherent states of the radiation field,” Physical Review,

vol. 131, no. 6, p. 2766, 1963.

[5] C.-N. Yang and R. L. Mills, “Conservation of isotopic spin and isotopic gauge invari-

ance,” Physical review, vol. 96, no. 1, p. 191, 1954.

[6] G. t’Hooft, 50 years of Yang-Mills theory. World Scientific, 2005.

[7] C. W. Misner, K. S. Thorne, and J. A. Wheeler, Gravitation. Princeton University

Press, 2017.

[8] F. Teixeira and W. C. Chew, “Differential forms, metrics, and the reflectionless absorp-

tion of electromagnetic waves,” Journal of Electromagnetic Waves and Applications,

vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 665–686, 1999.

[9] W. C. Chew, E. Michielssen, J.-M. Jin, and J. Song, Fast and efficient algorithms in

computational electromagnetics. Artech House, Inc., 2001.

[10] A. Volta, “On the electricity excited by the mere contact of conducting substances

of different kinds. in a letter from Mr. Alexander Volta, FRS Professor of Natural

Philosophy in the University of Pavia, to the Rt. Hon. Sir Joseph Banks, Bart. KBPR

S,” Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London, no. 90, pp. 403–431, 1800.

[11] A.-M. Amp`ere, Expos´e m´ethodique des ph´enom`enes ´electro-dynamiques, et des lois de

ces ph´enom`enes. Bachelier, 1823.

[12] ——, M´emoire sur la th´eorie math´ematique des ph´enom`enes ´electro-dynamiques unique-

ment d´eduite de l’exp´erience: dans lequel se trouvent r´eunis les M´emoires que M.

Amp`ere a communiqu´es `a l’Acad´emie royale des Sciences, dans les s´eances des 4 et

331

332 Electromagnetic Field Theory

26 d´ecembre 1820, 10 juin 1822, 22 d´ecembre 1823, 12 septembre et 21 novembre 1825.

Bachelier, 1825.

[13] B. Jones and M. Faraday, The life and letters of Faraday. Cambridge University Press,

2010, vol. 2.

[14] G. Kirchhoff, “Ueber die aufl¨osung der gleichungen, auf welche man bei der unter-

suchung der linearen vertheilung galvanischer str¨ome gef¨uhrt wird,” Annalen der Physik,

vol. 148, no. 12, pp. 497–508, 1847.

[15] L. Weinberg, “Kirchhoff’s’ third and fourth laws’,” IRE Transactions on Circuit Theory,

vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 8–30, 1958.

[16] T. Standage, The Victorian Internet: The remarkable story of the telegraph and the

nineteenth century’s online pioneers. Phoenix, 1998.

[17] J. C. Maxwell, “A dynamical theory of the electromagnetic field,” Philosophical trans-

actions of the Royal Society of London, no. 155, pp. 459–512, 1865.

[18] H. Hertz, “On the finite velocity of propagation of electromagnetic actions,” Electric

Waves, vol. 110, 1888.

[19] M. Romer and I. B. Cohen, “Roemer and the first determination of the velocity of light

(1676),” Isis, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 327–379, 1940.

[20] A. Arons and M. Peppard, “Einstein’s proposal of the photon concept–a translation of

the Annalen der Physik paper of 1905,” American Journal of Physics, vol. 33, no. 5,

pp. 367–374, 1965.

[21] A. Pais, “Einstein and the quantum theory,” Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 51, no. 4,

p. 863, 1979.

[22] M. Planck, “On the law of distribution of energy in the normal spectrum,” Annalen der

physik, vol. 4, no. 553, p. 1, 1901.

[23] Z. Peng, S. De Graaf, J. Tsai, and O. Astafiev, “Tuneable on-demand single-photon

source in the microwave range,” Nature communications, vol. 7, p. 12588, 2016.

[24] B. D. Gates, Q. Xu, M. Stewart, D. Ryan, C. G. Willson, and G. M. Whitesides, “New

approaches to nanofabrication: molding, printing, and other techniques,” Chemical

reviews, vol. 105, no. 4, pp. 1171–1196, 2005.

[25] J. S. Bell, “The debate on the significance of his contributions to the foundations of

quantum mechanics, Bell’s Theorem and the Foundations of Modern Physics (A. van

der Merwe, F. Selleri, and G. Tarozzi, eds.),” 1992.

[26] D. J. Griffiths and D. F. Schroeter, Introduction to quantum mechanics. Cambridge

University Press, 2018.

[27] C. Pickover, Archimedes to Hawking: Laws of science and the great minds behind them.

Oxford University Press, 2008.

Image Theory 333

[28] R. Resnick, J. Walker, and D. Halliday, Fundamentals of physics. John Wiley, 1988.

[29] S. Ramo, J. R. Whinnery, and T. Duzer van, Fields and waves in communication

electronics, Third Edition. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1995, also 1965, 1984.

[30] J. L. De Lagrange, “Recherches d’arithm´etique,” Nouveaux M´emoires de l’Acad´emie de

Berlin, 1773.

[31] J. A. Kong, Electromagnetic Wave Theory. EMW Publishing, 2008.

[32] H. M. Schey, Div, grad, curl, and all that: an informal text on vector calculus. WW

Norton New York, 2005.

[33] R. P. Feynman, R. B. Leighton, and M. Sands, The Feynman lectures on physics, Vols.

I, II, & III: The new millennium edition. Basic books, 2011, vol. 1,2,3.

[34] W. C. Chew, Waves and fields in inhomogeneous media. IEEE Press, 1995, also 1990.

[35] V. J. Katz, “The history of Stokes’ theorem,” Mathematics Magazine, vol. 52, no. 3,

pp. 146–156, 1979.

[36] W. K. Panofsky and M. Phillips, Classical electricity and magnetism. Courier Corpo-

ration, 2005.

[37] T. Lancaster and S. J. Blundell, Quantum field theory for the gifted amateur. OUP

Oxford, 2014.

[38] W. C. Chew, “Fields and waves: Lecture notes for ECE 350 at UIUC,”

https://engineering.purdue.edu/wcchew/ece350.html, 1990.

[39] C. M. Bender and S. A. Orszag, Advanced mathematical methods for scientists and

engineers I: Asymptotic methods and perturbation theory. Springer Science & Business

Media, 2013.

[40] J. M. Crowley, Fundamentals of applied electrostatics. Krieger Publishing Company,

1986.

[41] C. Balanis, Advanced Engineering Electromagnetics. Hoboken, NJ, USA: Wiley, 2012.

[42] J. D. Jackson, Classical electrodynamics. John Wiley & Sons, 1999.

[43] R. Courant and D. Hilbert, Methods of Mathematical Physics: Partial Differential Equa-

tions. John Wiley & Sons, 2008.

[44] L. Esaki and R. Tsu, “Superlattice and negative differential conductivity in semicon-

ductors,” IBM Journal of Research and Development, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 61–65, 1970.

[45] E. Kudeki and D. C. Munson, Analog Signals and Systems. Upper Saddle River, NJ,

USA: Pearson Prentice Hall, 2009.

[46] A. V. Oppenheim and R. W. Schafer, Discrete-time signal processing. Pearson Edu-

cation, 2014.

334 Electromagnetic Field Theory

[47] R. F. Harrington, Time-harmonic electromagnetic fields. McGraw-Hill, 1961.

[48] E. C. Jordan and K. G. Balmain, Electromagnetic waves and radiating systems.

Prentice-Hall, 1968.

[49] G. Agarwal, D. Pattanayak, and E. Wolf, “Electromagnetic fields in spatially dispersive

media,” Physical Review B, vol. 10, no. 4, p. 1447, 1974.

[50] S. L. Chuang, Physics of photonic devices. John Wiley & Sons, 2012, vol. 80.

[51] B. E. Saleh and M. C. Teich, Fundamentals of photonics. John Wiley & Sons, 2019.

[52] M. Born and E. Wolf, Principles of optics: electromagnetic theory of propagation, in-

terference and diffraction of light. Elsevier, 2013.

[53] R. W. Boyd, Nonlinear optics. Elsevier, 2003.

[54] Y.-R. Shen, The principles of nonlinear optics. New York, Wiley-Interscience, 1984.

[55] N. Bloembergen, Nonlinear optics. World Scientific, 1996.

[56] P. C. Krause, O. Wasynczuk, and S. D. Sudhoff, Analysis of electric machinery.

McGraw-Hill New York, 1986.

[57] A. E. Fitzgerald, C. Kingsley, S. D. Umans, and B. James, Electric machinery.

McGraw-Hill New York, 2003, vol. 5.

[58] M. A. Brown and R. C. Semelka, MRI.: Basic Principles and Applications. John

Wiley & Sons, 2011.

[59] C. A. Balanis, Advanced engineering electromagnetics. John Wiley & Sons, 1999, also

1989.

[60] Wikipedia, “Lorentz force,” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lorentz force/, accessed:

2019-09-06.

[61] R. O. Dendy, Plasma physics: an introductory course. Cambridge University Press,

1995.

[62] P. Sen and W. C. Chew, “The frequency dependent dielectric and conductivity response

of sedimentary rocks,” Journal of microwave power, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 95–105, 1983.

[63] D. A. Miller, Quantum Mechanics for Scientists and Engineers. Cambridge, UK:

Cambridge University Press, 2008.

[64] W. C. Chew, “Quantum mechanics made simple: Lecture notes for ECE 487 at UIUC,”

http://wcchew.ece.illinois.edu/chew/course/QMAll20161206.pdf, 2016.

[65] B. G. Streetman and S. Banerjee, Solid state electronic devices. Prentice hall Englewood

Cliffs, NJ, 1995.

Image Theory 335

[66] Smithsonian, “This 1600-year-old goblet shows that the romans were

nanotechnology pioneers,” https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/

this-1600-year-old-goblet-shows-that-the-romans-were-nanotechnology-pioneers-787224/,

accessed: 2019-09-06.

[67] K. G. Budden, Radio waves in the ionosphere. Cambridge University Press, 2009.

[68] R. Fitzpatrick, Plasma physics: an introduction. CRC Press, 2014.

[69] G. Strang, Introduction to linear algebra. Wellesley-Cambridge Press Wellesley, MA,

1993, vol. 3.

[70] K. C. Yeh and C.-H. Liu, “Radio wave scintillations in the ionosphere,” Proceedings of

the IEEE, vol. 70, no. 4, pp. 324–360, 1982.

[71] J. Kraus, Electromagnetics. McGraw-Hill, 1984, also 1953, 1973, 1981.

[72] Wikipedia, “Circular polarization,” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circular

polarization.

[73] Q. Zhan, “Cylindrical vector beams: from mathematical concepts to applications,”

Advances in Optics and Photonics, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–57, 2009.

[74] H. Haus, Electromagnetic Noise and Quantum Optical Measurements, ser. Advanced

Texts in Physics. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2000.

[75] W. C. Chew, “Lectures on theory of microwave and optical waveguides, for ECE 531

at UIUC,” https://engineering.purdue.edu/wcchew/course/tgwAll20160215.pdf, 2016.

[76] L. Brillouin, Wave propagation and group velocity. Academic Press, 1960.

[77] R. Plonsey and R. E. Collin, Principles and applications of electromagnetic fields.

McGraw-Hill, 1961.

[78] M. N. Sadiku, Elements of electromagnetics. Oxford University Press, 2014.

[79] A. Wadhwa, A. L. Dal, and N. Malhotra, “Transmission media,” https://www.

slideshare.net/abhishekwadhwa786/transmission-media-9416228.

[80] P. H. Smith, “Transmission line calculator,” Electronics, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 29–31, 1939.

[81] F. B. Hildebrand, Advanced calculus for applications. Prentice-Hall, 1962.

[82] J. Schutt-Aine, “Experiment02-coaxial transmission line measurement using slotted

line,” http://emlab.uiuc.edu/ece451/ECE451Lab02.pdf.

[83] D. M. Pozar, E. J. K. Knapp, and J. B. Mead, “ECE 584 microwave engineering labora-

tory notebook,” http://www.ecs.umass.edu/ece/ece584/ECE584 lab manual.pdf, 2004.

[84] R. E. Collin, Field theory of guided waves. McGraw-Hill, 1960.

336 Electromagnetic Field Theory

[85] Q. S. Liu, S. Sun, and W. C. Chew, “A potential-based integral equation method for

low-frequency electromagnetic problems,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propa-

gation, vol. 66, no. 3, pp. 1413–1426, 2018.

[86] M. Born and E. Wolf, Principles of optics: electromagnetic theory of propagation, in-

terference and diffraction of light. Pergamon, 1986, first edition 1959.

[87] Wikipedia, “Snell’s law,” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snell’s law.

[88] G. Tyras, Radiation and propagation of electromagnetic waves. Academic Press, 1969.

[89] L. Brekhovskikh, Waves in layered media. Academic Press, 1980.

[90] Scholarpedia, “Goos-hanchen effect,” http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/

Goos-Hanchen effect.

[91] K. Kao and G. A. Hockham, “Dielectric-fibre surface waveguides for optical frequen-

cies,” in Proceedings of the Institution of Electrical Engineers, vol. 113, no. 7. IET,

1966, pp. 1151–1158.

[92] E. Glytsis, “Slab waveguide fundamentals,” http://users.ntua.gr/eglytsis/IO/Slab

Waveguides p.pdf, 2018.

[93] Wikipedia, “Optical fiber,” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Optical fiber.

[94] Atlantic Cable, “1869 indo-european cable,” https://atlantic-cable.com/Cables/

1869IndoEur/index.htm.

[95] Wikipedia, “Submarine communications cable,” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/

Submarine communications cable.

[96] D. Brewster, “On the laws which regulate the polarisation of light by reflexion from

transparent bodies,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, vol.

105, pp. 125–159, 1815.

[97] Wikipedia, “Brewster’s angle,” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brewster’s angle.

[98] H. Raether, “Surface plasmons on smooth surfaces,” in Surface plasmons on smooth

and rough surfaces and on gratings. Springer, 1988, pp. 4–39.

[99] E. Kretschmann and H. Raether, “Radiative decay of non radiative surface plasmons

excited by light,” Zeitschrift f¨ur Naturforschung A, vol. 23, no. 12, pp. 2135–2136, 1968.

[100] Wikipedia, “Surface plasmon,” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surface plasmon.

[101] Wikimedia, “Gaussian wave packet,” https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:

Gaussian wave packet.svg.

[102] Wikipedia, “Charles K. Kao,” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles K. Kao.

[103] H. B. Callen and T. A. Welton, “Irreversibility and generalized noise,” Physical Review,

vol. 83, no. 1, p. 34, 1951.

Image Theory 337

[104] R. Kubo, “The fluctuation-dissipation theorem,” Reports on progress in physics, vol. 29,

no. 1, p. 255, 1966.

[105] C. Lee, S. Lee, and S. Chuang, “Plot of modal field distribution in rectangular and

circular waveguides,” IEEE transactions on microwave theory and techniques, vol. 33,

no. 3, pp. 271–274, 1985.

[106] W. C. Chew, Waves and Fields in Inhomogeneous Media. IEEE Press, 1996.

[107] M. Abramowitz and I. A. Stegun, Handbook of mathematical functions: with formulas,

graphs, and mathematical tables. Courier Corporation, 1965, vol. 55.

[108] ——, “Handbook of mathematical functions: with formulas, graphs, and mathematical

tables,” http://people.math.sfu.ca/∼cbm/aands/index.htm.

[109] W. C. Chew, W. Sha, and Q. I. Dai, “Green’s dyadic, spectral function, local density

of states, and fluctuation dissipation theorem,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1505.01586, 2015.

[110] Wikipedia, “Very Large Array,” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Very Large Array.

[111] C. A. Balanis and E. Holzman, “Circular waveguides,” Encyclopedia of RF and Mi-

crowave Engineering, 2005.

[112] M. Al-Hakkak and Y. Lo, “Circular waveguides with anisotropic walls,” Electronics

Letters, vol. 6, no. 24, pp. 786–789, 1970.

[113] Wikipedia, “Horn Antenna,” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horn antenna.

[114] P. Silvester and P. Benedek, “Microstrip discontinuity capacitances for right-angle

bends, t junctions, and crossings,” IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Tech-

niques, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 341–346, 1973.

[115] R. Garg and I. Bahl, “Microstrip discontinuities,” International Journal of Electronics

Theoretical and Experimental, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 81–87, 1978.

[116] P. Smith and E. Turner, “A bistable fabry-perot resonator,” Applied Physics Letters,

vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 280–281, 1977.

[117] A. Yariv, Optical electronics. Saunders College Publ., 1991.

[118] Wikipedia, “Klystron,” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Klystron.

[119] ——, “Magnetron,” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cavity magnetron.

[120] ——, “Absorption Wavemeter,” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Absorption wavemeter.

[121] W. C. Chew, M. S. Tong, and B. Hu, “Integral equation methods for electromagnetic

and elastic waves,” Synthesis Lectures on Computational Electromagnetics, vol. 3, no. 1,

pp. 1–241, 2008.

[122] A. D. Yaghjian, “Reflections on Maxwell’s treatise,” Progress In Electromagnetics Re-

search, vol. 149, pp. 217–249, 2014.

338 Electromagnetic Field Theory

[123] L. Nagel and D. Pederson, “Simulation program with integrated circuit emphasis,” in

Midwest Symposium on Circuit Theory, 1973.

[124] S. A. Schelkunoff and H. T. Friis, Antennas: theory and practice. Wiley New York,

1952, vol. 639.

[125] H. G. Schantz, “A brief history of uwb antennas,” IEEE Aerospace and Electronic

Systems Magazine, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 22–26, 2004.

[126] E. Kudeki, “Fields and Waves,” http://remote2.ece.illinois.edu/∼erhan/FieldsWaves/

ECE350lectures.html.

[127] Wikipedia, “Antenna Aperture,” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antenna aperture.

[128] C. A. Balanis, Antenna theory: analysis and design. John Wiley & Sons, 2016.

[129] R. W. P. King, G. S. Smith, M. Owens, and T. Wu, “Antennas in matter: Fundamentals,

theory, and applications,” NASA STI/Recon Technical Report A, vol. 81, 1981.

[130] H. Yagi and S. Uda, “Projector of the sharpest beam of electric waves,” Proceedings of

the Imperial Academy, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 49–52, 1926.

[131] Wikipedia, “Yagi-Uda Antenna,” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yagi-Uda antenna.

[132] Antenna-theory.com, “Slot Antenna,” http://www.antenna-theory.com/antennas/

aperture/slot.php.

[133] A. D. Olver and P. J. Clarricoats, Microwave horns and feeds. IET, 1994, vol. 39.

[134] B. Thomas, “Design of corrugated conical horns,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and

Propagation, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 367–372, 1978.

[135] P. J. B. Clarricoats and A. D. Olver, Corrugated horns for microwave antennas. IET,

1984, no. 18.

[136] P. Gibson, “The vivaldi aerial,” in 1979 9th European Microwave Conference. IEEE,

1979, pp. 101–105.

[137] Wikipedia, “Vivaldi Antenna,” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vivaldi antenna.

[138] ——, “Cassegrain Antenna,” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cassegrain antenna.

[139] ——, “Cassegrain Reflector,” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cassegrain reflector.

[140] W. A. Imbriale, S. S. Gao, and L. Boccia, Space antenna handbook. John Wiley &

Sons, 2012.

[141] J. A. Encinar, “Design of two-layer printed reflectarrays using patches of variable size,”

IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 49, no. 10, pp. 1403–1410, 2001.

[142] D.-C. Chang and M.-C. Huang, “Microstrip reflectarray antenna with offset feed,” Elec-

tronics Letters, vol. 28, no. 16, pp. 1489–1491, 1992.

Image Theory 339

[143] G. Minatti, M. Faenzi, E. Martini, F. Caminita, P. De Vita, D. Gonz´alez-Ovejero,

M. Sabbadini, and S. Maci, “Modulated metasurface antennas for space: Synthesis,

analysis and realizations,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 63,

no. 4, pp. 1288–1300, 2014.

[144] X. Gao, X. Han, W.-P. Cao, H. O. Li, H. F. Ma, and T. J. Cui, “Ultrawideband and

high-efficiency linear polarization converter based on double v-shaped metasurface,”

IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 63, no. 8, pp. 3522–3530, 2015.

[145] D. De Schweinitz and T. L. Frey Jr, “Artificial dielectric lens antenna,” Nov. 13 2001,

US Patent 6,317,092.

[146] K.-L. Wong, “Planar antennas for wireless communications,” Microwave Journal,

vol. 46, no. 10, pp. 144–145, 2003.

[147] H. Nakano, M. Yamazaki, and J. Yamauchi, “Electromagnetically coupled curl an-

tenna,” Electronics Letters, vol. 33, no. 12, pp. 1003–1004, 1997.

[148] K. Lee, K. Luk, K.-F. Tong, S. Shum, T. Huynh, and R. Lee, “Experimental and simu-

lation studies of the coaxially fed U-slot rectangular patch antenna,” IEE Proceedings-

Microwaves, Antennas and Propagation, vol. 144, no. 5, pp. 354–358, 1997.

[149] K. Luk, C. Mak, Y. Chow, and K. Lee, “Broadband microstrip patch antenna,” Elec-

tronics letters, vol. 34, no. 15, pp. 1442–1443, 1998.

[150] M. Bolic, D. Simplot-Ryl, and I. Stojmenovic, RFID systems: research trends and

challenges. John Wiley & Sons, 2010.

[151] D. M. Dobkin, S. M. Weigand, and N. Iyer, “Segmented magnetic antennas for near-field

UHF RFID,” Microwave Journal, vol. 50, no. 6, p. 96, 2007.

[152] Z. N. Chen, X. Qing, and H. L. Chung, “A universal UHF RFID reader antenna,” IEEE

transactions on microwave theory and techniques, vol. 57, no. 5, pp. 1275–1282, 2009.

[153] C.-T. Chen, Linear system theory and design. Oxford University Press, Inc., 1998.

[154] S. H. Schot, “Eighty years of Sommerfeld’s radiation condition,” Historia mathematica,

vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 385–401, 1992.

[155] A. Ishimaru, Electromagnetic wave propagation, radiation, and scattering from funda-

mentals to applications. Wiley Online Library, 2017, also 1991.

[156] A. E. H. Love, “I. the integration of the equations of propagation of electric waves,”

Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing Papers

of a Mathematical or Physical Character, vol. 197, no. 287-299, pp. 1–45, 1901.

[157] Wikipedia, “Christiaan Huygens,” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christiaan Huygens.

[158] ——, “George Green (mathematician),” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George Green

(mathematician).

340 Electromagnetic Field Theory

[159] C.-T. Tai, Dyadic Green’s Functions in Electromagnetic Theory. PA: International

Textbook, Scranton, 1971.

[160] ——, Dyadic Green functions in electromagnetic theory. Institute of Electrical &

Electronics Engineers (IEEE), 1994.

[161] W. Franz, “Zur formulierung des huygensschen prinzips,” Zeitschrift f¨ur Naturforschung

A, vol. 3, no. 8-11, pp. 500–506, 1948.

[162] J. A. Stratton, Electromagnetic Theory. McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc., 1941.

[163] J. D. Jackson, Classical Electrodynamics. John Wiley & Sons, 1962.

[164] W. Meissner and R. Ochsenfeld, “Ein neuer effekt bei eintritt der supraleitf¨ahigkeit,”

Naturwissenschaften, vol. 21, no. 44, pp. 787–788, 1933.

[165] Wikipedia, “Superconductivity,” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superconductivity.

[166] D. Sievenpiper, L. Zhang, R. F. Broas, N. G. Alexopolous, and E. Yablonovitch, “High-

impedance electromagnetic surfaces with a forbidden frequency band,” IEEE Transac-

tions on Microwave Theory and techniques, vol. 47, no. 11, pp. 2059–2074, 1999.

Related documents

PDF
Lecture 35: Sommerfeld Integral and Weyl Identity
Lecture 35: Sommerfeld Integral and Weyl Identity

22 pages

0% (0)
PDF
Lecture 33: High Frequency Solutions and Gaussian Beams
Lecture 33: High Frequency Solutions and Gaussian Beams

20 pages

0% (0)
PDF
Lecture 18 Hollow Waveguides and Rectangular Modes
Lecture 18 Hollow Waveguides and Rectangular Modes

15 pages

0% (0)
PDF
Lecture 30 Reciprocity Theorem in Electromagnetics
Lecture 30 Reciprocity Theorem in Electromagnetics

20 pages

0% (0)
PDF
Lecture 21: Resonators and Cavity Resonators
Lecture 21: Resonators and Cavity Resonators

20 pages

0% (0)
PDF
Lecture 14: Single Interface Reflection and Transmission
Lecture 14: Single Interface Reflection and Transmission

16 pages

0% (0)
PDF
Lecture 34: Rayleigh Scattering and Mie Scattering
Lecture 34: Rayleigh Scattering and Mie Scattering

22 pages

0% (0)
PDF
Lecture 32: Image Theory in Electromagnetic Field Theory
Lecture 32: Image Theory in Electromagnetic Field Theory

22 pages

0% (0)
PDF
Lecture 31: Equivalence Theorem and Huygens’ Principle
Lecture 31: Equivalence Theorem and Huygens’ Principle

19 pages

0% (0)
PDF
Lecture 28: Different Types of Antennas – Heuristics
Lecture 28: Different Types of Antennas – Heuristics

24 pages

0% (0)