Study Muddy
Study Muddy

Upload, organize, preview, and share study documents from one clean workspace.

Explore

BrowseAbout UsContact Us

Workspace

UploadDashboard

Legal

Privacy PolicyTerms & ConditionsDisclaimerReport Copyright & Abuse
Study Muddy
DOC·0% (0)·0 views·82 pages

Introduction to Mutual Funds and Types of Mutual Funds

An introductory document on mutual funds covering their meaning, types, investment objectives, NAV, industry structure, and history in India.

Category: Finance

Uploaded by Hannah Mitchell on Apr 27, 2026

Copyright

© All Rights Reserved

We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.

Available Formats

Download as PDF, TXT or DOCX.

Download PDF
/ 82
100%
82

Document text

1

1.1 INTRODUCTION

A Mutual Fund is a collective investment vehicle that combines the resources of

numerous investors with similar financial objectives. The fund manager utilizes

these pooled funds to invest in various securities, such as stocks, bonds, and

money market instruments, based on the scheme's objectives. Returns generated

from these investments, including both income and capital appreciation, are

distributed among unit holders in proportion to their holdings. Mutual Funds

offer an accessible and cost-effective means for individuals to invest in a

professionally managed, diversified portfolio, requiring only a modest surplus of

funds, sometimes as little as a few thousand rupees. Each Mutual Fund scheme

is characterized by a distinct investment objective and strategy.

In today's intricate and contemporary financial landscape, a Mutual Fund stands

out as the optimal investment avenue. With the maturity and information-driven

nature of markets spanning equity shares, bonds, real estate, derivatives, and

other fixed income instruments, price fluctuations are often influenced by global

events taking place in distant corners of the world. It's improbable for the

average individual to possess the requisite knowledge, expertise, motivation, and

time to monitor these events, comprehend their implications, and react promptly.

Additionally, individuals face challenges in maintaining oversight of their asset

ownership, investments, brokerage fees, bank transactions, and other financial

obligations.

A Mutual Fund provides the solution to these challenges by employing

professionally qualified and experienced personnel to oversee each of these

functions on a full-time basis. The substantial pool of funds gathered by the

mutual fund enables it to engage such personnel at a minimal cost to each

investor. Consequently, the mutual fund leverages economies of scale across

research, investments, and transaction processing. While the concept of

collective investment by individuals is not novel, the modern Mutual Fund

emerged as a phenomenon of the 20th century, gaining significant popularity

2

post-World War II. Today, thousands of firms globally offer tens of thousands of

mutual funds catering to diverse investment objectives.

At the close of March 2006, there were 29 mutual funds overseeing assets

totaling Rs. 2,31,862 crore across 590 schemes.

Mutual fund schemes may be classified based on its structure and its investment

objective.

TYPES OF MUTUAL FUNDS:

Open-ended funds:

An open-ended fund remains open for subscription throughout the year, lacking

a fixed maturity date. Investors have the flexibility to purchase and redeem units

at prices linked to the net asset value (NAV). The primary characteristic of open-

ended schemes is their liquidity..

Closed-ended funds:

A closed-ended fund typically has a predetermined maturity period, typically

ranging from 3 to 15 years. Subscription to the fund is only available during a

specified window. Investors can participate in the scheme during the initial

public offering, and thereafter, they can trade the units on the stock exchanges

where they are listed. To facilitate investor exits, some closed-ended funds offer

the option to sell units back to the mutual fund through periodic repurchase at

NAV-related prices. SEBI regulations mandate that at least one of these exit

routes must be provided to investors.

Interval funds:

3

Interval funds blend the characteristics of both open-ended and closed-ended

schemes, permitting sale or redemption at NAV-related prices during

predetermined intervals.

Real Estate Funds:

These funds are closed-ended and primarily invest in real estate and properties,

offering long-term yield.

BY INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE:

Growth Funds:

Growth funds aim to achieve capital appreciation over the medium to long term,

typically by investing a significant portion of their assets in equities. Historical

data has demonstrated that stocks tend to outperform other investment types

when held over extended periods. These schemes are particularly suitable for

investors with a long-term perspective who seek growth over time.

Income Funds:

Income funds are designed to offer investors a consistent and reliable stream of

income. Typically, these schemes allocate their investments to fixed income

securities such as bonds, corporate debentures, and government securities.

Income funds are well-suited for those seeking capital stability and a dependable

income stream.

Balanced Funds:

Balanced funds aim to offer a blend of growth and consistent income. These

schemes periodically distribute a portion of their earnings and invest in both

equities and fixed income securities according to the proportions outlined in

their offer documents. While in a bullish stock market, the NAV of these

schemes may not necessarily rise in tandem, nor decline proportionately during

market downturns. They are well-suited for investors seeking a mix of income

and moderate growth.

Money market Funds:

4

Money market funds aim to offer convenient liquidity, capital preservation, and

moderate income. These schemes typically invest in safer short-term instruments

such as treasury bills, certificates of deposit, commercial paper, and inter-bank

call money. Returns on these schemes may vary depending on prevailing market

interest rates. They serve as an ideal option for both corporate and individual

investors to temporarily park their surplus funds. A load fund is one that imposes

a commission for entry or exit. This means that each time units are bought or

sold in the fund, a commission is levied. Entry and exit loads typically range

from 1% to 2%. Despite the load, it might be advantageous to invest in the fund

if it has a strong performance history.

No-Load Funds:

A No-Load Fund is characterized by its absence of commission charges for entry

or exit. This means that investors are not required to pay any commission when

purchasing or selling units in the fund. One of the primary benefits of a no-load

fund is that the entire invested amount is utilized for investment purposes..

Equity Fund:

A Mutual Fund invests solely in equity shares of a company, thereby assuming

the risks associated with such investments.

Hedge Funds:

Mutual Funds that engage in speculative trading purchase shares anticipated to

rise in price and sell shares expected to decline.

OTHER SCHEMES:

Tax Saving Schemes:

These schemes provide tax benefits to investors under particular provisions of

Indian Income Tax laws, as the government incentivizes investment in specified

avenues. Investments in Equity Linked Savings Schemes (ELSS) and Pension

5

Schemes qualify for deductions under section 88 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

Additionally, the Act offers opportunities for investors to save on capital gains

tax under sections 54EA and 54EB by investing in Mutual Funds, provided the

capital asset was sold before April 2000 and the investment is made before

September 30, 2000.

SPECIAL SCHEMES

Industry specific schemes

Sector-specific funds exclusively invest in the industries delineated in their offer

documents, restricting their investments to particular sectors such as InfoTech,

FMCG, Pharmaceuticals, among others..

Index schemes

Index Funds seek to mirror the performance of a specific index, such as the BSE

Sensex or the NSE 50.

Sectorial schemes

Sectorial Funds are funds that exclusively invest in a designated industry, a

group of industries, or various segments, such as 'A' Group shares or initial

public offerings.

NAV OF A MUTUAL FUND

NAV, which stands for net asset value, typically denotes the net asset value per

unit. It signifies the actual value of one unit of a fund on any given day,

reflecting the performance of a specific mutual fund scheme. Put simply, NAV

represents the market value of the securities held by the scheme, fluctuating

daily in accordance with changes in market value.

NAV is calculated as follows

Market value of all the investments & Income + Profit- Loss–Expenses

Number of units in the mutual funds

The NAV of the scheme will be computed at the close of each business day,

subject to the values and regulations that SEBI may periodically issue, and will

6

undergo annual audits. The NAV of the fund fluctuates based on investments

made and other transactions, either increasing or decreasing. Various factors

influence the value of the NAV.

POSITIVE FACTORS:

The NAV can increase due to following factors

 Dividend

 Interest

 Capital gains – Shares

 Capital gains – Bonds

 Capital gains – Right issue

 Capital gains – Bonus

NEGATIVE FACTORS:

The NAV can decrease due to following factors.

 Interest

 Capital losses – Shares

 Capital losses - Bonds

 Corpus reduction – Redemptions

 Corpus Reduction – Inter scheme transfers.

7

1.2 INDUSTRY PROFILE

STRUCTURE OF THE MUTUAL FUND INDUSTRY:

There are many entities involved in the mutual fund’s organization. The

structure is explained below. It mainly comprises the following

Typically, a mutual fund scheme is initiated by a Sponsor, responsible for

organizing and marketing the fund. The Sponsor outlines the investment

objectives, associated risks, costs, entry and exit rules, and operational

guidelines. In India, as in most countries, these sponsors require approval from

the regulator, SEBI (Securities Exchange Board of India), which assesses their

track record and financial strength.

The Sponsor then appoints an Asset Management Company (AMC) to execute

the investment strategy according to the fund's objectives. Additionally, the

Sponsor engages a custodian for safeguarding the fund's assets and may enlist a

third-party registry to manage unit holder (subscriber) records. Notably, in India,

the Sponsor often promotes the Asset Management Company, in which it holds a

majority stake, sometimes even up to 100%. However, in many other countries,

there is no requirement for a direct link between the sponsor and the asset

management company in terms of ownership.

The mutual fund scheme operates as a trust registered under the Indian Trust Act,

overseen by a trustee company promoted by the Sponsor. Typically, the Trustee

Company serves as a nominal entity, while its trustees, often experienced and

esteemed individuals from various sectors, ensure effective administration.

8

The AMC is required to engage an external custodian responsible for

safeguarding the fund's assets and managing various transactions, including cash

and non-cash benefits. The custodian, usually a bank or financially sound

institution, also handles investor services such as issuing certificates, account

statements, redemption checks, and dividend payments.

Additionally, many AMCs enlist a registry and transfer agent to facilitate unit

transactions, manage investor records, and handle inquiries and services such as

address changes and certificate replacements. The AMC reports to the trustees,

who bear the responsibility of protecting investors' interests and ensuring

compliance with SEBI guidelines. They oversee the performance of the AMC, as

well as the operations of the custodian and transfer agent.

9

HISTORY OF MUTUAL FUNDS IN INDIA AND ROLE OF

SEBI IN MUTUAL FUNDS INDUSTRY

The inception of the mutual fund industry in India dates back to 1963 with the

establishment of Unit Trust of India, initiated by the Government of India and

Reserve Bank. The history of mutual funds in India can be categorized into four

main phases.

They are:

First Phase – 1964 – 87

Established in 1963 through an Act of Parliament, Unit Trust of India (UTI)

operated under the regulatory and administrative oversight of the Reserve Bank

of India (RBI). In 1978, UTI was separated from the RBI, with the Industrial

Development Bank of India (IDBI) assuming regulatory and administrative

control. The inaugural scheme introduced by UTI was Unit Scheme 1964. By

the conclusion of 1988, UTI managed assets worth Rs. 6700 crores.

Second Phase – 1987 – 1993 (Entry of Public Sector Funds)

In 1987, the mutual fund landscape in India expanded with the introduction of

non-UTI, public sector mutual funds established by public sector banks, and

entities like Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) and General Insurance

Corporation of India (GIC). SBI Mutual Fund emerged as the pioneer among

these, founded in June 1987, followed by Canara Bank Mutual Fund (Dec 87),

Punjab National Bank Mutual Fund (Aug 89), Indian Bank Mutual Fund (Nov

89), Bank of India (Jun 90), and Bank of Baroda Mutual Fund (Oct 92). LIC

established its mutual fund in June 1989, while GIC set up its mutual fund in

December 1990. By the close of 1993, the mutual fund industry managed assets

worth Rs. 47,004 crores.

10

Third Phase – 1993 – 2003 (Entry of Private Sector Funds)

The entry of private sector funds in 1993 marked the beginning of a new era in

the Indian mutual fund industry, offering investors a broader range of fund

options. Additionally, 1993 saw the introduction of the first Mutual Fund

Regulations, requiring registration and regulation of all mutual funds, except

UTI. The former Kothari Pioneer (now merged with Franklin Templeton)

became the inaugural private sector mutual fund registered in July 1993.

Subsequently, the 1993 SEBI (Mutual Fund) Regulations were replaced by more

comprehensive and revised Mutual Fund Regulations in 1996, under which the

industry operates today.

The number of mutual fund houses continued to rise, with numerous foreign

mutual funds establishing a presence in India, alongside a series of mergers and

acquisitions within the industry. As of January 2003, there were 33 mutual funds

collectively managing assets worth Rs. 1,21,805 crores. Unit Trust of India led

the pack with assets under management totaling Rs. 44,541 crores.

Fourth Phase – since February 2003

In February 2003, following the repeal of the Unit Trust of India Act 1963, UTI

underwent bifurcation into two separate entities. One entity is the Specified

Undertaking of the Unit Trust of India, managing assets worth Rs.29,835 crores

as of January 2003, primarily comprising the assets of the US 64 scheme,

assured return, and certain other schemes. Operated under an administrator and

governed by rules established by the Government of India, this entity falls

outside the scope of Mutual Fund Regulations.

The second entity is UTI Mutual Fund Ltd, sponsored by SBI, PNB, BOB, and

LIC. Registered with SEBI and operating under Mutual Fund Regulations, it

emerged from the bifurcation process.

With the division of the former UTI, which managed over Rs.76,000 crores in

assets as of March 2000, and the establishment of UTI Mutual Fund, compliant

with SEBI Mutual Fund Regulations, alongside recent mergers among private

sector funds, the mutual fund industry has transitioned into its current phase of

11

consolidation and expansion. As of September 2004, there were 29 funds

managing assets worth Rs.1,53,108 crores across 421 schemes.

MUTUAL FUND CONSTITUENTS

All mutual funds consist of four components: Sponsors, Trustees, Asset

Management Company (AMC), and Custodians.

SPONSORS:

Sponsors propose the establishment of a mutual fund, which may be a registered

company, scheduled bank, or financial institution. Sponsors must meet specific

criteria, including capital requirements, a track record of at least five years in

financial services, a history of default-free transactions, and a reputation for

fairness. Sponsors appoint the TRUSTEE, Asset Management Company (AMC),

and Custodian. Upon the formation of the AMC, the sponsor assumes the role of

a stakeholder.

TRUST/BOARD OF TRUSTEES:

Trustees bear a fiduciary responsibility towards unit holders, safeguarding their

interests. They oversee the launch and promotion of schemes, obtain necessary

approvals, monitor the AMC's investments to ensure compliance with

established limits, safeguard the fund's assets, and ensure timely returns to unit

holders. Trustees also review the AMC's due diligence. Major decisions

concerning the fund require unit holders' consent. Trustees submit reports to

SEBI every six months, while investors receive an annual report. Trustees are

remunerated annually, receiving 0.5% of the weekly net asset value from the

fund's assets.

FUND MANAGERS/AMC:

The Asset Management Company (AMC) is responsible for managing investors'

funds. It makes investment decisions, distributes dividends, maintains accurate

accounting records for unit pricing, calculates the NAV, and provides

information on listed schemes. The AMC also conducts due diligence on

12

investments and submits quarterly reports to the trustees. An AMC is restricted

from acting for any other fund or engaging in other business activities aside from

asset management. Its net worth must not dip below Rs. 10 crores, and its fee

should not exceed 1.25% for collections below Rs. 100 crores and 1% for

collections above Rs. 100 crores. SEBI can take action against an AMC if it

deviates from its designated role.

CUSTODIAN:

Independent organizations often serve as custodians, responsible for

safeguarding the securities and other assets of mutual funds. Their duties

encompass receiving and delivering securities, collecting income, distributing

dividends, securely holding units, and segregating assets and settlements

between schemes. Custodians typically charge fees ranging from 0.15% to 0.2%

of the net value of the holdings. It is common for custodians to provide services

to multiple funds.

TAX ASPECTS OF MUTUAL FUNDS

INCOME RECEIVED FROM MUTUAL FUNDS:

Dividends received from all mutual funds are tax free in the hands of investors,

irrespective of the kind of scheme they have invested in. However, Mutual funds

have to pay distribution tax of 10% (plus surcharges @ 5% of the applicable tax

rate) in debt and income schemes. Equity oriented schemes, i.e. schemes, which

have more than 50% invested in domestic equities, are however exempt from

paying the distribution tax.

CAPITAL GAINS TAX:

Capital gain refers to the variance between the sale consideration and the cost of

acquisition of an asset. If an investor sells their units and realizes capital gains,

they are subject to capital gains tax. Capital gains can be categorized into two

types: short-term and long-term capital gains.

SHORT TERM CAPITAL GAINS:

13

Units held for less than one year are considered short-term capital gains, and the

investor will be taxed based on their applicable income tax rate.

LONG TERM CAPITAL GAINS:

Units held for over 12 months are classified as long-term capital assets. Investors

are subject to long-term capital gains tax on units held for more than 12 months.

In this case the investor will

1: Tax is levied at a fixed rate of 10% (plus a 20% surcharge on the applicable

tax rate) on capital gains without indexation.

2: Alternatively, investors can opt for cost indexation on capital gains and pay a

20% tax rate (plus a 5% surcharge on the applicable tax rate), choosing the lower

amount between the two options.

TDS ON REDEMPTION:

Mutual funds are not subject to TDS deduction on capital gains realized upon

redemption.

SECTION 88 OF INCOME TAX ACT:

Investors can deduct 20% of the invested amount (up to a maximum of

Rs.10,000) in specified Mutual funds, known as Equity Linked Savings Schemes

(ELSS), from their tax liability in a given year, with a maximum tax saving of

Rs.2,000 per investor. However, investors must remain invested for a lock-in

period of three years.

14

1.3 COMPANY PROFILE

Housing Development Finance Corporation Limited (HDFC)

Incorporated in 1977, HDFC was the first specialized Mortgage Company in

India, primarily focused on providing financial assistance for residential housing

purchase or construction to individuals, corporates, and developers. While

offering property-related services such as property identification, sales, and

valuation, as well as training and consultancy, housing finance remains its core

activity. As of June 30, 2006, HDFC boasted a client base of approximately

1,000,000 borrowers, around 830,000 depositors, 93,900 shareholders, and

50,000 deposit agents. HDFC has successfully raised funds from various

international agencies including the World Bank, IFC (Washington), USAID,

DEG, ADB, and KFW, along with international syndicated loans, domestic term

loans from banks and insurance companies, bonds, and deposits. Notably, HDFC

has maintained the highest rating for its bonds and deposits program for twelve

consecutive years. Additionally, HDFC Standard Life Insurance Company

Limited, promoted by HDFC, made history as the first private sector life

insurance company to receive a Certificate of Registration from the Insurance

Regulatory and Development Authority on October 23, 2000, allowing it to

conduct life insurance business in India.

HDFC Trustee Company Limited:

A company formed under the Companies Act, 1956 serves as the Trustee for the

Mutual Fund, as outlined in the Trust deed dated June 8, 2000, and amended

periodically. HDFC Trustee Company Limited operates as a wholly owned

subsidiary of HDFC Limited.

HDFC Asset Management Company Limited (AMC):

Established under the Companies Act, 1956, on December 10, 1999, HDFC

Asset Management Company Ltd (AMC) obtained approval to function as an

15

Asset Management Company for the HDFC Mutual Fund from SEBI, as

confirmed by its letter dated June 30, 2000. The registered office of the AMC is

located at Ramon House, 3rd Floor, H.T. Parekh Marg, 169, Back Bay

Reclamation, Churchgate, Mumbai - 400 020. Per the Investment Management

Agreement, the Trustee has enlisted the AMC to oversee the operations of the

Mutual Fund. The AMC has a paid-up capital of Rs.25.161 crores.

According to the terms of the Investment Management Agreement, the AMC

will manage the operations of the Mutual Fund and oversee the assets of the

schemes, including those launched periodically.

The present shareholding pattern of the AMC is as follows:

Particulars % of the paid-up capital

Housing Development Finance Corporation

Limited 60

Standard Life Investments Limited 40

Following a strategic review, Zurich Insurance Company (ZIC), the Sponsor of

Zurich India Mutual Fund, opted to divest its Asset Management business in

India. Subsequently, the AMC entered into an agreement with ZIC to acquire the

aforementioned business, pending requisite regulatory approvals. Upon securing

the necessary regulatory clearances, the following Schemes of Zurich India

Mutual Fund transitioned to HDFC Mutual Fund on June 19, 2003, and have

since been rebranded as follows:

Former Name New Name

Zurich India Equity Fund HDFC Equity Fund

Zurich India Prudence Fund HDFC Prudence Fund

Zurich India Capital Builder Fund HDFC Capital Builder Fund

Zurich India Tax Saver Fund HDFC Tax Saver

Zurich India Top 200 Fund HDFC Top 200 Fund

16

Zurich India High Interest Fund HDFC High Interest Fund

Zurich India Liquidity Fund HDFC Cash Management Fund

Zurich India Sovereign Gilt Fund HDFC Sovereign Gilt Fund

The AMC manages three closed-ended schemes, namely HDFC Fixed

Investment Plan, HDFC Long Term Equity Fund, and HDFC Fixed Maturity

Plans, along with 22 open-ended schemes of the Mutual Fund, including HDFC

Growth Fund (HGF), HDFC Balanced Fund (HBF), HDFC Income Fund (HIF),

HDFC Liquid Fund (HLF), HDFC Long Term Advantage Fund (formerly

HDFC Tax Plan 2000)(HTP), HDFC Children's Gift Fund (HDFC CGF), HDFC

Gilt Fund (HGILT), HDFC Short Term Plan (HSTP), HDFC Index Fund, HDFC

Floating Rate Income Fund (HFRIF), HDFC Equity Fund (HEF), HDFC Top

200 Fund (HT200), HDFC Capital Builder Fund (HHIF), HDFC Cash

Management Fund (HCMF), HDFC MF Monthly Income Plan (HMIP), HDFC

Core & Satellite Fund (HCSF), HDFC Multiple Yield Fund (HMYF), HDFC

Premier Multi-Cap Fund (HPM), and HDFC Multiple Yield Fund - Plan 2005

(HMY2005).

Additionally, the AMC offers portfolio management and advisory services,

which are not conflicting with the activities of the Mutual Fund. The AMC's

registration from SEBI, under Registration No. - PM / INP000000506, to act as a

Portfolio Manager under the SEBI (Portfolio Managers) Regulations, 1993, has

been renewed. The Certificate of Registration is valid from January 1, 2010, to

December 31, 2011.

Board of directors

As per SEBI Regulations, at least two-thirds of the directors on the board of

trustee company or board of trustees must be independent, meaning they should

have no association with the sponsors. Furthermore, 50% of the directors on the

board of the Asset Management Company (AMC) must also be independent.

17

The Board of Directors of HDFC Asset Management Limited

(AMC) consists of the following eminent persons.

 Mr. Deepak S. Parekh

 Mr. N. Keith Skeoch

 Mr. Keki M. Mistry

 Mr. James Aird

 Mr. P. M. Thampi

 Mr. Humayun Dhanrajgir

 Dr. Deepak B. Phatak

 Mr. Hoshang S. Billimoria

 Mr. Rajeshwar Raj Bajaj

 Mr. Vijay Merchant

 Ms. Renu S. Karnad

 Mr. Milind Barve

CHAPTER-II

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

2.1 NEED FOR THE STUDY

 The main purpose of doing this project was to study about selected mutual

fund schemes and its functioning.

 This helps to know the details about mutual fund industry right from its

inception stage, growth and feature prospects.

 It also helps in understanding different schemes of selected mutual funds.

2.2 PROBLEM DEFINITON

18

A Study on mutual funds at HDFC BANK Pvt. Ltd., Andhra Pradesh.

To optimize the selection and management of mutual funds for clients at HDFC

Bank, taking into account their risk appetite, investment goals, and market

conditions. This includes designing robust investment strategies, conducting

thorough research on various mutual fund options, monitoring performance

regularly, and providing tailored recommendations to clients to help them

achieve their financial objectives efficiently. Additionally, the problem involves

ensuring compliance with regulatory requirements and offering transparent

communication to clients regarding the features, benefits, and risks associated

with mutual fund investments.

1.3 OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY

The present study aims with following objectives:

 To have comparison between investments in bank and mutual fund.

 To critically analyze the behavioral attitude of mutual funds investors.

19

1.4 SCOPE OF THE STUDY

Mutual fund is the pool of the money, based on the trust who invests the savings

of a number of investors who shares a common financial goal, like the capital

appreciation and dividend earning. Investors invest money and get the units as

per the unit value which we called as NAV (net assets value). Mutual fund is the

most suitable investment.

The present study primarily deals with equity mutual funds Last 5 years data has

been taken for the purpose of the Sharpe measure and Treynor measure have

been used for the purpose of the analysis. This study confines as how mutual

fund is good investment for investors. The study considers performance

evaluation of selected equity mutual funds

2.5 RESEARCH DESIGN

Based on the objectives of the study descriptive research has been adopted

descriptive is one, which largely used to drawn interfaces about the possible

relationship between variables. It is the simplest type of research. It is the

simplest type of research. It is designed to gather descriptive information and

provide information for formulating more sophisticated studies.

2.6 DATA SOURCE

Sources of data are only from secondary data

Secondary data:

Collecting data entirely from primary sources is challenging and costly.

Secondary data, gathered from past records, magazines, newspapers, and the

internet, encompasses information previously collected for other purposes.

 Interaction with the executives & distributors of HDFC mutual fund

origination also helped in assessing information.

 We conducted a sample survey to determine the level of awareness and

investment in mutual funds, as well as savings patterns among participants.

20

 For a survey to yield meaningful results, clear objectives are essential.

Initially, setting objectives provided a clear direction for the survey.

 Data for the study was obtained by browsing from the internet, industry

related journals and company publications.

 The collected data was analyzed using graph-based and relative rating

methods.

2.7 TOOLS FOR ANALYSIS

1. Standard Deviation:

The following steps are involved in calculating variance or standard deviation of

returns of assets or securities using historical returns.

 Calculate the average rate of return using equation

Average Rate of Return (R) =∑ R

n

 Calculate the squared deviation of each individual rate of return from the

average rate of return. (R-R) 2

 Calculate the sum of the squares of the deviations as determined in the

preceding step and divide it by the number of periods (observations) less one to

obtain variance

 Calculate the square root of the variance to determine the standard

deviation

Standard Deviation (S.D) =√ ∑( R - R )2

N

2. Calculation of Beta:

A commonly advocated measure of risk is beta. The beta of a portfolio is

computed similarly to the beta of an individual security. To calculate the beta of

a portfolio, regress the rate of return of the portfolio against the rate of return of

21

a market index. The slope of this regression line represents the portfolio beta,

reflecting the systematic risk of the portfolio.

Beta (β) = n∑ xy - ∑ x ∑ y

n∑ x2 -(∑ x )2

3. Performance measure:

To effectively assess portfolio performance, it's essential to account for both risk

and return. Three commonly used measures for evaluating portfolio performance

include the Treynor measure and the Sharpe measure.

a. Treynor measure:

Jack Treynor suggests that systematic risk, also known as beta, is the suitable

gauge of risk, as proposed by the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM). The

Treynor measure of a portfolio relates the excess return of the portfolio to its

beta.

Treynor Ratio =

AverageReturnonportfolio - AverageReturnofreturnonriskfreeinvestment

Beta Coefficient of Portfolio

Treynor Ratio = R p - Rf

β p

The Treynor measure's numerator represents the portfolio's risk premium, while

its denominator signifies the systematic risk (beta). Therefore, the Treynor

measure indicates the excess return achieved per unit of risk. By considering

systematic risk as the primary risk measure, the Treynor measure tacitly assumes

the portfolio's diversification adequacy.

b. Sharpe ratio:

The Sharpe measure resembles the Treynor measure but utilizes standard

deviation, rather than beta, as the risk measure.

Sharpe Ratio

= AverageReturnonPortfolio - AverageReturnofreturnonriskfreeinvestment

StandardDeviationofPortfolio

22

= R p - Rf

σ p

Therefore, the Sharpe ratio measures the excess return gained from a portfolio

relative to its total risk, represented by standard deviation per unit.

2.8 LIMITATIONS OF THE STUDY

People are unwilling to allocate their time to respond to the

questionnaire.

 People will not have clear idea about the concept of mutual funds.

 Unsatisfied investors are not willing to talk about the mutual funds.

 The schemes have only been compared based on two performance

parameters..

 The comparison of various schemes has been done on the basis of

theoretical data the opinion of the employers in HDFC mutual funds have

not been taken into consideration

 The study of deals with only selected equity schemes of sample fund

houses operating in India.

 To evaluate the performance of the selected schemes of selected MFs but

not their inception.

2.9 CHAPTERIZATION

Chapter-1: - It deals with introduction, industry profile, company profile

Chapter-2: - It deals with research methodology, objectives of the study

Chapter-3: - It deals with data analysis and interpretation

Chapter-4: - It deals with findings, suggestions, conclusion

APPENDIX: - Bibliography &Annual reports

23

24

CHAPTER-III

DATA ANALYSIS &INTERPRETATION

BSE MARKET INDEX:

TABLE NO 3.1: Calculation of Rate of Return of BSE market:

Year Sensex

opening

Sensex

closing

Rate of return R

2018-2019 17426.96 18835.77 18835.77 - 17426.96

17426.96 ×100 8.08

2019-2020 18890.81 22386.27 22386.27 - 18890.81

18890.81 ×100 18.50

2020-2021 22455.23 27957.49 27957.49 - 22455.23

22455.23 ×100 24.50

2021-2022 27954.86 25341.86 25341.86 - 27954.86

27954.86 ×100 -9.35

2022-2023 25301.7 29620.5 29620.5 - 25301.7

25301.7 ×100 17.06

= 58.79

The average rate of return per year over a five-year period is.

R = ∑ R

n = 58.79

5 = 11.75

INTERPRETATION:

The average rate of return per year for the BSE Market Index over the specified

5-year period is approximately 11.75%. This indicates the average annual growth

25

or decline in the BSE Market Index over the period, reflecting the overall

performance of the stock market during that time.

26

BSLI EQUITY FUND

Table No: 3.2. Calculation of Rate of Return of BSLI Equity Fund:

Year NAV opening NAV Closing Rate of return

2018-2019 240.32 252.69 5.14

2019-2020 254.71 319.89 25.58

2020-2021 320.62 487.03 51.90

2021-2022 491.3 463.93 -5.57

2022-2023 463.81 626.32 35.03

∑R=112.08

Rate of return = closing price - opening price

opening price ×100

The average annual rate of return over five years is

R = ∑ R

n = 112.08

5 = 22.4

INTERPRETATION:

The average rate of return per year for the investment over the specified 5-year

period is approximately 22.42%. This indicates the average annual growth or

decline in the investment's value over the period, reflecting the overall

performance of the investment during that time.

27

Table No: 3.3. Calculation of standard deviation of BSLI Equity Fund:

year Fund

Return (R)

Average

Return (R)

(R-R) (R-R)2

2018-2019 5.14 22.41 -17.27 298.25

2019-2020 25.58 22.41 3.17 10.04

2020-2021 51.90 22.41 29.49 869.66

2021-2022 -5.57 22.41 -27.98 782.88

2022-2023 35.03 22.41 12.62 159.26

∑(R-R)2 = 2110.05

STANDARD DEVIATION = √ ∑( R - R )2

N

= √ 1053.24

5 = √210.64

=14.51

INTERPRETATION:

The standard deviation of approximately 14.51 indicates the average deviation of

returns from the mean return. In other words, it represents the volatility or risk

associated with the investment's returns.

28

29

Table No: 3.4: Beta calculation for BSLI Equity Fund:

Beta (β) = n∑ xy - ∑ x ∑ y

n∑ x2 -(∑ x )2 = 5 ( 2435.99 ) -(58.79 )(112.08 )

5 (1386.24 ) -(58.79 )2

= 5590.77

3474.94

= 1.60

Interpretation:

The Beta of BSLI Equity Fund is greater than the Bench Mark i.e., 1.60 > 1.

Risk Adjustment Return:

Risk Adjustment return= Rate of Return

Standard Deviation = R

σ

=112.08/20.54

Year Market

Returns (x)

Fund

Returns (y)

x2 XY

2019-

2020

8.08 5.14 65.28 41.53

2020-

2021

18.50 25.58 342.25 473.23

2021-

2022

24.50 51.90 600.25 1271.55

2022-

2023

-9.35 -5.57 87.42 52.07

2023-

2024

17.06 35.03 291.04 597.61

∑X= 58.79 ∑Y=112.08 ∑X2 =1386.24 ∑XY=2435.99

30

=5.45

Interpretation:

BSLI Equity Fund earned a risk premium of 5.45 for each unit of risk.

Treynor Ratio Calculation For BSLI:

Treynor Ratio = R p - Rf

β p

FUND BETA VALUE β p = 1.60

FUND AVERAGE RETURN R p = 22.41

RISK FREE RATEOF INVESTMENT Rf = 7.25

Treynor Ratio = 22.41 - 7.25

1.60 = 9.47

Sharpe Ratio Calculation For BSLI:

Sharpe Ratio = R p - Rf

σ p

STANDARD DEVIATION σ p= 20.54

FUND AVERAGE RETURN R p= 22.41

RISK FREE RATE OF INVESTMENT Rf = 7.25

SHARPE RATIO = 22.41 - 7.25

20.54 = 0.73

Interpretation:

The Treynor ratio and Sharpe ratio, of BSLI Equity Fund is 9.47 and 0.73

31

32

HDFC EQUITY FUND

Table No:3.5: Calculation of Rate of Return of HDFC Equity Fund:

Rate of return = closing price - opening price

opening price ×100

The average yearly rate of return over a five-year period is

R = ∑ R

n = 87.60

5 = 17.52

Year NAV Opening NAV Closing Rate Of Return (R)

2019-2020 255.33 271.10 6.17

2020-2021 272.42 331.98 21.86

2021-2022 332.27 469.72 41.36

2022-2023 474.44 416.70 -12.17

2023-2024 417.04 543.76 30.38

∑ R = 87.60

33

Table No:3.6: Calculation of Standard deviation of HDFC Equity Fund:

STANDARD DEVIATION = √ ∑( R - R )2

N

= √ 1762.85

5 = √352.27

= 18.77

Interpretation:

Average Return of HDFC Equity Fund is 17.52 and Standard Deviation is 18.77

for 5 years.

Year Fund

Returns(R)

Average

Return (R)

(R-R) (R-R)2

2019-2020 6.17 17.52 -11.35 128.82

2020-2021 21.86 17.52 4.34 18.83

2021-2022 41.36 17.52 23.84 568.34

2022-2023 -12.17 17.52 -29.69 881.49

2023-2024 30.38 17.52 12.86 165.37

∑ R =87.6 ∑ ( R - R )2 =1762.85

34

Table No:3.7: Beta calculation for HDFC Equity Fund:

Beta (β) = n∑ xy - ∑ x ∑ y

n∑ x2 -(∑ x )2 = 5 ( 2099.64 ) -(58.79 )( 87.60 )

5 (1386.24 ) -(58.79 )2

= 5348.2

3474.

= 1.53

Interpretation:

The Beta of HDFC Equity Fund is greater than the Bench Mark i.e., 1.53 > 1.

Risk Adjustment Return:

Risk Adjustment return= Rate of Return

Standard Deviation = R

σ

=87.60/18.77 = 4.66

Year Market

Returns (x)

Fund

Returns (y) x2 XY

2019-2020 8.08 6.17 65.28 49.85

2020-2021 18.50 21.86 342.25 404.41

2021-2022 24.50 41.36 600.25 1013.32

2022-2023 -9.35 -12.17 87.42 113.78

2023-2024 17.06 30.38 291.04 518.28

∑X= 58.79 ∑Y=87.60 ∑X2 = 1386.24 ∑XY= 2099.64

35

Interpretation:

For each unit of risk HDFC Equity Fund earned 4.66 risk premiums.

Treynor Ratio Calculation For HDFC Equity Fund:

Treynor Ratio = R p - Rf

β p

FUND BETA VALUE β p = 1.53

FUND AVERAGE RETURN R p = 17.52

RISK FREE RATEOF INVESTMENT Rf = 7.25

Treynor Ratio = 17.52 - 7.25

1.53 = 6.71

Sharpe Ratio Calculation For HDFC Equity Fund:

Sharpe Ratio = R p - Rf

σ p

STANDARD DEVIATION σ p= 18.77

FUND AVERAGE RETURN R p= 17.52

RISK FREE RATE OF INVESTMENT Rf = 7.25

SHARPE RATIO = 17.52 - 7.25

18.77 = 0.54

Interpretation:

The Treynor ratio and Sharpe ratio of HDFC Equity Fund is 6.71 and 0.54.

36

37

SBI EQUITY FUND

Table No: 3.8: Calculation of Rate of Return:

Rate of return = closing price - opening price

opening price ×100

Average rate of return per year for 5 years is R = ∑ R

n = 76.34

5 = 15.26

Year NAV Opening NAV Closing Rate Of Return (R)

2019-2020 43.34 46.42 7.10

2020-2021 46.56 53.95 15.87

2021-2022 54.05 75.41 39.51

2022-2023 76.17 72.77 -4.46

2023-2024 72.68 86.0 18.32

∑ R = 76.34

38

Table No: 3.9: Calculation of Standard deviation:

STANDARD DEVIATION = √ ∑( R - R )2

N

= √ 1053.24

5 = √210.64

= 14.51

Interpretation:

Average Return of SBI Equity Fund is 15.26 and Standard Deviation is 14.51

for 5 years.

Year Fund

Returns (R)

Average

Return (R)

(R-R) (R-R)2

2019-2020 7.10 15.26 -8.16 66.58

2020-2021 15.87 15.26 0.61 0.37

2021-2022 39.51 15.26 24.25 588.06

2022-2023 -4.46 15.26 -19.72 388.87

2023-2024 18.32 15.26 3.06 9.36

∑ ( R - R )2 = 1053.24

39

Table no 3.10. Beta calculation for SBI equity fund:

year Market

Return (X)

Fund

return(y)

x2 XY

2018-2019 8.08 7.10 65.28 57.36

2019-2020 18.50 15.87 342.25 293.59

2020-2021 24.50 39.51 600.25 968

2021-2022 -9.35 -4.46 87.42 41.70

2022-2023 17.06 18.32 291.04 312.53

∑X=58.59 ∑Y=76.34 ∑x2 = 1386.24 ∑XY=1673.18

Beta (β) = n∑ xy - ∑ x ∑ y

n∑ x2 -(∑ x )2

= 5 (1673.18 )-(58.79 )(76.34 )

5 (1386.24 ) - (58.79 )2

=3877.88/3474.94

=1.121

INTERPRETATION:

A beta of approximately 1.121 suggests that the SBI Equity Fund tends to move

approximately 1.121 times as much as the market. If the market moves up or

down by 1%, we can expect the fund to move up or down by about 1.121%.

Since it's greater than 1, this implies the fund is slightly more volatile than the

market.

40

41

Treynor Ratio calculation for SBI Equity fund:

Treynor ratio = R p - Rf

β p

FUND BETA VALUE β p = 1.11

FUND AVERAGE RETURN R p = 15.26

RISK FREE RATE OF INVESTMENT Rf =7.25

Treynor ratio = 15.26 - 7.25

1.11

=7.21

INTERPRETATION:

The Treynor Ratio of 7.21 indicates that for each unit of systematic risk

(measured by beta), the fund generates a return of approximately 7.21 percentage

points above the risk-free rate.

42

Sharpe Ratio calculation for SBI Equity fund:

Sharpe Ratio = R p - Rf

σ p

STANDARD DEVIATION σ p = 14.51

FUND AVERAGE RETURN R p = 7.25

Sharpe ratio = 15.26 - 7.25

14.51

= 0.55

INTERPRETATION:

The Sharpe Ratio of approximately 0.552 indicates that for each unit of total risk

(measured by standard deviation), the fund generates a return of approximately

0.552 percentage points above the risk-free rate.

43

AXIS EQUITY FUND

TABLE NO 3.11 Calculation of Rate of return Axis Equity Fund:

Year NAV opening NAV closing Rate of Return(R)

2018-2019 10.56 12.12 14.77

2019-2020 12.14 14.52 19.60

2020-2021 14.49 19.5 34.57

2021-2022 19.69 18.24 -7.36

2022-2023 18.18 20.91 15.01

∑R=76.59

Rate of Return = Closing price - Opening price

Opening price ×100

Average Rate of return per year for 5 years is R = ∑ R

n = 76.59

5 =15.31

INTERPRETATION:

The average rate of return per year for the AXIS Equity Fund over the specified

5-year period is approximately 15.31%. This indicates the average annual growth

or decline in the Net Asset Value (NAV) of the fund over the period, reflecting

the overall performance of the fund during that time.

44

TABLE NO:3.12.Calculation of standard deviation of Axis Equity Fund:

year Fund return

(R)

Average

Return (R )

(R-R) (R-R)2

2018-2019 14.67 15.31 -0.54 0.29

2019-2020 19.60 15.31 4.29 18.40

2020-2021 34.57 15.31 19.26 370.94

2021-2022 -7.36 15.31 -22.67 513.92

2022-2023 15.01 15.31 -0.3 0.09

∑(R-R)2 = 903.64

STANDARD DEVIATION = √ ∑( R - R )2

N

= √ 903.64

5 = √180.72 = 13.44

INTERPRETATION: -

The standard deviation of approximately 13.44 indicates the average deviation of

returns from the mean return. In other words, it represents the volatility or risk

associated with the fund's returns.

45

TABLE NO:3.13. Beta calculation for AXIS Equity fund:

year Market

Return(x)

Fund

Return(y)

x2 XY

2018-2019 8.80 14.77 65.28 119.34

2019-2020 18.50 19.60 342.25 362.6

2020-2021 24.50 34.57 600.25 846.96

2021-2022 -9.35 -7.36 87.42 68.81

2022-2023 17.06 15.01 291.04 256.07

∑x=58.79 ∑y=76.59 ∑x2=1386.24 ∑XY=1653.78

Beta (β) = n ∑ xy - ∑ x ∑ y

n ∑ x2 -(∑ x )2

= 3766.18/3474.94

= 1.08

INTERPRETATION:

A beta of 1.085 suggests that the AXIS Equity fund tends to move approximately

1.085 times as much as the market. If the market moves up or down by 1%, we

can expect the fund to move up or down by about 1.085%. Since it's greater than

1, this implies the fund is slightly more volatile than the market.

46

47

Treynor Ratio calculation for AXIS Equity Fund:

Treynor Ratio = R p - Rf

β p

FUND BETA VALUE β p = 1.08

FUND AVERAGE RETURN R p=15.31

Risk free Rate of investment Rf = 7.25

Treynor RATIO = 15.31 - 7.25

1.08

=7.46

INTERPRETATION:

The Treynor Ratio of 7.46 indicates that for each unit of systematic risk

(measured by beta), the fund generates a return of approximately 7.46 percentage

points above the risk-free rate.

48

Sharpe Ratio calculation for AXIS Equity fund:

Sharpe Ratio = R p - Rf

σ p

STANDARD DEVIATION σ p= 13.44

FUND AVERAGE RETURN R p= 15.31

RISK FREE RATE OF INVESTMENT Rf =7.25

SHARPE RATIO = 15.31 - 7.25

13.44

= 0.59

INTERPRETATION:

The Sharpe Ratio of 0.597 indicates that for each unit of total risk (measured by

standard deviation), the fund generates a return of approximately 0.597

percentage points above the risk-free rate.

49

HSBC EQUITY FUND

Table no 3.14 Calculation of Rate of Return of HSBC Equity Fund:

year NAV opening NAV closing Rate of Return (R)

2018-2019 96.80 100.15 3.46

2019-2020 100.64 117.57 16.82

2020-2021 117.94 150.83 27.88

2021-2022 152.05 141.26 -7.09

2023-2023 140.65 176.93 25.79

∑ R= 66.86

Rate of Return = closing price - opening price

opening price ×100

Average Rate of Return for 5 years is R = ∑ R

n = 66.86

5 = 13.37

INTERPRETATION:

The average rate of return per year for the HSBC Equity Fund over the specified

5-year period is approximately 13.37%. This indicates the average annual growth

or decline in the Net Asset Value (NAV) of the fund over the period, reflecting

the overall performance of the fund during that time.

50

TABLE NO:3.15 Calculation for standard deviation of HSBC Equity Fund:

year Fund

Return (R)

Average

Return (R )

( R- R ) (R-R)2

2018-2019 3.46 13.37 -9.91 98.20

2019-2020 16.82 13.37 3.45 11.90

2020-2021 27.88 13.37 14.51 210.54

2021-2022 -7,09 13.37 -20.46 418.61

2022-2023 25.79 13.37 12.42 154.25

∑ ( R - R )2 = 893.5

Standard Deviation = √∑( R - R )2

N

= √ 893.5

5

= √178.7

= 13.36

INTERPRETATION:

The standard deviation of approximately 13.36 indicates the average deviation of

returns from the mean return. In other words, it represents the volatility or risk

associated with the fund's returns.

51

TABLE NO 3.16 Beta calculation for HSBC Equity fund:

year Market

Return (x)

Fund Return

(y)

x2 XY

2018-2019 8.08 3.46 65.28 27.95

2019-2020 18.50 16.82 342.25 311.17

2020-2021 24.50 27.88 600.25 683.06

2021-2022 -9.35 -7.09 87.42 66.29

2022-2023 17.06 25.79 291.04 439.97

∑X=58.79 ∑Y=66.86 ∑X2 =1386.24 ∑XY=1528.44

Beta(β) = n∑ xy - ∑ x ∑ y

n∑ x2 -(∑ x )2

5 (1528.44 ) - (58.79 )( 66.86 )

5 (1386.24 ) -(58.79 )2

= 3711.5/3474.94

= 1.06

INTERPRETATION: -

A beta of approximately 1.073 suggests that the HSBC Equity Fund tends to

move approximately 1.073 times as much as the market. If the market moves up

or down by 1%, we can expect the fund to move up or down by about 1.073%.

Since it's greater than 1, this implies the fund is slightly more volatile than the

market.

52

Treynor Ratio calculation for HSBC Equity Fund:

Treynor Ratio = R p - Rf

β p

FUND BETA VALUE β p = 1.06

FUND AVERAGE RETURN R p= 13.37

RISK FREE RATEOF INVESTMENT Rf = 7.2

Treynor Ratio = 13.37 - 7.2

1.06

= 6.82

INTERPRETATION:

The Treynor Ratio of approximately 5.82 indicates that for each unit of

systematic risk (measured by beta), the fund generates a return of approximately

5.82 percentage points above the risk-free rate. This suggests that the HSBC

Equity Fund has provided a favorable return relative to its level of systematic

risk.

53

Sharpe Ratio calculation for HSBC Equity Fund:

Sharpe Ratio = R p - Rf

σ p

STANDARD DEVIATION σ p=13.36

FUND AVERAGE RETURN R p= 13.37

RISK FREE RATE OF INVESTMENT Rf = 7.25

SHARPE RATIO = 13.37 - 7.25

13.36 = 0.457

INTERPRETATION:

The Sharpe Ratio of approximately 0.457 indicates that for each unit of total risk

(measured by standard deviation), the fund generates a return of approximately

0.457 percentage points above the risk-free rate. This suggests that the HSBC

Equity Fund has provided a positive return relative to the total risk taken.

However, the ratio is relatively low, indicating that the excess return may not

fully compensate for the level of risk taken.

54

TABLE NO 3.17: Showing rank for average rate of return of 5 years:

Source: data collected from company annual reports

Chart no: 3.17 Average Rate of Return chart

BSL Equity Fund HDFC Equity Fund AXIS Equity Fund SBI Equity Fund HSBC Equity Fund

0

5

10

15

20

25

20.54

17.52

15.31 15.26

13.37

AVERAGE RATE OF RETURN

YEARS

RATI0

INTERPRETATION:

BSL Equity Fund earned highest average rate of return and meanwhile HSBC

Equity fund has given the lowest rate of return among all the fund for 5 years.

S.NO Company name Average Rate of Return Rank

1 BSL Equity Fund 20.54 1

2 HDFC Equity Fund 17.52 2

3 AXIS Equity Fund 15.31 3

4 SBI Equity Fund 15.26 4

5 HSBC Equity Fund 13.37 5

55

TABLE NO:3.18 standard deviation:

S.NO Company name Standard deviation

1 BSL Equity fund 20.54

2 HDFC Equity fund 18.77

3 AXIS Equity fund 14.51

4 SBI Equity fund 13.44

5 HSBC Equity fund 13.36

Source: data collected from company annual reports

BSL Equity fund HDFC Equity fund AXIS Equity fund SBI Equity fund HSBC Equity fund

0

5

10

15

20

25

20.54

18.77

14.51 13.44 13.36

Standard deviation

YEARS

RATIO

INTERPRETATION:

Based on the provided data, the HSBC Equity fund exhibits the lowest standard

deviation at 13.36, followed closely by the AXIS Equity fund with a slightly

higher value of 13.44.

56

TABLE NO:3.19 Beta Performance chart:

S.NO Company name Standard deviation

1 BSL Equity fund 1.60

2 HDFC Equity fund 1.53

3 AXIS Equity fund 1.11

4 SBI Equity fund 1.08

5 HSBC Equity fund 1.06

Source: data collected from company annual reports

BSL Equity fund HDFC Equity fund AXIS Equity fund SBI Equity fund HSBC Equity fund

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

1.6 1.53

1.11 1.08 1.06

BETA PERFORMANCE CHART

YEARS

RATIO

INTERPRETATION:

Based on the data provided, it is evident that the HSBC Equity fund possesses the

lowest beta at 1.06, while the AXIS Equity fund has the second lowest beta at

1.08, indicating a relatively higher volatility compared to the HSBC fund in

response-to-market-fluctuations.

57

TABLE NO:3.20 Table showing Risk adjusted Return:

S.NO Company name Risk adjusted return Rank

1 BSL Equity fund 5.45 2

2 HDFC Equity fund 4.66 5

3 SBI Equity fund 5.26 3

4 AXIS Equity fund 5.69 1

5 HSBC Equity fund 5 4

Source: data collected from company annual reports

BSL Equity fund HDFC Equity fund SBI Equity fund AXIS Equity fund HSBC Equity fund

0

1

2

3

4

5

6 5.45

4.66

5.26

5.69

5

Risk adjusted Return

YEAR

RATIO

INTERPRETATION:

The AXIS Equity fund has yielded the highest risk premium at 5.69, while the

Birla Sun Life Equity fund has also performed well in providing a risk premium

per unit of risk at 5.45, positioning it second among the compared funds.

58

TABLE NO:3.21 Treynor performance Measure: -

S.NO Company name Treynor Ratio Rank

1 BSL Equity fund 9.47 1

2 HDFC Equity fund 6.71 4

3 SBI Equity fund 7.21 3

4 AXIS Equity fund 7.46 2

5 HSBC Equity fund 5.77 5

Source: data collected from company annual reports

BSL Equity fund HDFC Equity fund SBI Equity fund AXIS Equity fund HSBC Equity fund

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10 9.47

6.71 7.21 7.46

5.77

Treynor Ratio

YEARS

RATIO

INTERPRETATION:

Birla Sun Life Equity fund secured the top position when evaluated using the

Treynor performance measure, while the AXIS Equity fund attained the second-

highest ranking in terms of risk premium according to Treynor's measure.

59

Table 3.22 showing Sharpe’s Ratio:

S.NO Company name Sharpe’s Ratio Rank

1 BSL Equity fund 0.73 1

2 HDFC Equity fund 0.54 4

3 SBI Equity fund 0.55 3

4 AXIS Equity fund 0.59 2

5 HSBC Equity fund 0.45 5

Source: data collected from company annual reports

BSL Equity fund HDFC Equity fund SBI Equity fund AXIS Equity fund HSBC Equity fund

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8 0.73

0.54 0.55 0.59

0.45

Sharpe’s Ratio

YEARS

RATIO

INTERPRETATION:

Birla Sun Life Equity fund achieved the highest rank when assessed by the

Sharpe ratio, with the AXIS Equity fund obtaining the second position..

60

A COMPREHENSIVE SUREVY ANALYSIS

3.23 Do you invest in mutual funds?

Table 3.23 Investing in Mutual Funds

Opinion No of respondents Percentage

Yes 15 33

No 13 29

May be 17 38

Total 45 100

33

29

38

Investing in Mutual Funds

Yes

No

May be

INTERPRETATION:

From the above table it is clear that while 34.1% of respondents are invest in

mutual funds,27.3% of respondents are not investing in mutual funds, 38.6% of

respondents are may be invested in mutual funds.

61

3.24 The age group under you belongs to?

Table 3.24 Representing the Age Group

Age group No of investors Percentage

20-30 18 40

31-40 27 60

Total 45 100

40

60

Age Group

20-30

31-40

INTERPRETATION:

From the above table it is observed that the age group 20-30 there are 45

investors which account for 40% of the total investors. for the age group 31-40,

the number of investors are 60%.

62

3.25.Occupation of the investors?

Table 3.25 Representing Occupation of the investors

Occupation No of investors Percentage

Business 21 47

Professional 15 33

Salaried 9 20

Total 45 100

47

33

20

Occupation of the Investors

Business

Professional

Salaried

INTERPRETATION:

From the above table it is observed that Almost half of the investors, 47% are

involved in Business, with professionals comprising 33%, and salaried

individuals making up 20% of the total investor.

63

3.26 Why do you invest in mutual funds?

Table 3.26 Factor influence to invest in Mutual Funds

Particulars No of Respondents Percentage

Safety 17 38

Good returns 22 49

Capital appreciation 4 9

Risk diversification 2 4

Total 45 100

38

49

9

4

Factor influencing to invest in Mutual Funds

Safety

Good returns

Capital appreciation

Risk diversification

INTERPRETATION:

From the above table it is observed that 38% of respondents invest in mutual

funds for purpose of safety.49% of respondents invest in mutual funds for

purpose of good returns.4% of respondents invest in mutual funds for purpose of

risk diversification

64

3.27 What is your income?

Table 3.27 Representing Income level of respondents

Income level No of Respondents Percentage

1 lakh 31 68

2-4 lakh 10 23

4-5 lakh 3 7

More than 5 lakhs 1 2

Total 45 100

68

23

7 2

Respondents Income Level

1 lakh

2-4 lakh

4-5 lakh

More than 5 lakhs

INTERPRETATION:

Based on the data presented in the table, it can be noted that 68% of investors

have an income below 1 lakh, 23% fall within the income range of 2-4 lakh, 7%

have incomes between 4-5 lakh, and 2% report an income exceeding 5 lakhs.

65

3.28 What is duration of your investment?

Table 3.28 Representing time period of investment

Duration No of investors Percentage

0-1 year 14 31

1-2 year 25 55

2-4 year 3 7

More than 4 years 3 7

Total 45 100

31

55

7

7

Time Period of Investment

0-1 year

1-2 year

2-4 year

More than 4 years

INTERPRETATION:

Based on the data provided in the table, it is evident that 31% of respondents are

inclined to invest for a duration of 0-1 year, 55% express interest in investments

spanning 1-2 years, while 7% are interested in a duration of 2-4 years, and a

further 7% show interest in investments exceeding 5 years.

66

3.29. How much do you invest?

Table 3.29 Representing amount of investment in Mutual funds

Amount of investment No of investors Percentage

10000 30 67

20000 11 24

20000-50000 4 9

Total 45 100

67

24

9

Amount of Investment

10000

20000

20000-50000

INTERPRETATION: -

Based on the data provided in the table, it's evident that 67% of the respondents

prefer investing below Rs. 50,000 in mutual funds, while 24% are interested in

investing between Rs. 50,000 and Rs. 100,000. Additionally, 9% of the

respondents express a willingness to invest amounts exceeding Rs. 100,000.

67

3.30 What type of Scheme do you prefer?

Table 3.30 Representing type of schemes investor invest

Schemes No of Respondents Percentage

Equity 13 29

Debt 4 9

Balanced 15 33

Fixed maturity plan 13 29

Total 45 100

29

9

33

29

Type of Schemes investor invest

Equity

Debt

Balanced

Fixed maturity plan

INTERPRETATION:

Based on the data presented in the table, it is evident that the majority of

investors, comprising 33%, favor balanced schemes. Following closely, 29% of

investors show preference for equity schemes, while an equal percentage opt for

fixed maturity plans. Conversely, the debt scheme attracts the least interest, with

only 9% of investors indicating a preference for it.

68

3.31 From which you came to know about mutual funds?

Table 3.31 Representing the way of knowing about mutual funds

Particulars No of respondents Percentage

Friend suggestion 17 38

Self- decision 20 44

Television 4 9

Agent/brokers 4 9

Total 45 100

38

44

9

9

Way of knowing about Mutual funds

Friend suggestion

Self- decision

Television

Agent/brokers

INTERPRETATION:

Based on the data provided in the table, it is evident that 9% of respondents

acquired knowledge about mutual funds through agents and television, while

44% made self-directed decisions. Additionally, 38% of respondents gained

insight into mutual funds through recommendations from friends.

69

3.32 What is risk performance?

Table 3.32 Representing the risk performance

Risk performance No of respondents Percentage

Innovator 14 31

Moderator 21 47

Risk adverse 10 22

Total 45 100

31

47

22

Risk Performance

Innovator

Moderator

Risk adverse

INTERPRETATION:

Based on the data provided in the table, it is evident that 31% of respondents are

categorized as innovators, demonstrating a willingness to invest substantial

amounts and embrace high levels of risk. Meanwhile, 47% of individuals

thoroughly evaluate various factors before determining their risk tolerance,

opting for moderate risk investments. Conversely, 22% of respondents express a

reluctance to take on any level of risk.

70

3.33 What type of scheme do you prefer?

Table 3.33 Representing the scheme the investor prefers

Scheme type No of respondents Percentage

Open-ended method 31 70

Close-ended method 7 16

Interval method 6 14

Total 44 100

70

16

14

Schemes investor prefers

Open-ended method

Close-ended method

Interval method

INTERPRETATION:

Based on the data provided in the table, it can be seen that 70% of respondents

favor the open-ended method, while 16% prefer close-ended schemes.

Additionally, 14% of respondents indicate a preference for interval schemes.

71

3.34 Performance of the fund manager?

Table 3.34 Representing the performance of fund manager

Particulars No of Respondents Percentage

Most important 17 38

Important 16 36

Neutral 9 20

Less important 2 4

Not all important 1 2

Total 45 100

38

36

20

4 2

Performance of the Fund Manager

Most important

Important

Neutral

Less important

Not all important

INTERPRETATION:

Based on the data presented in the table, it is evident that 38% of respondents

consider the performance of the fund manager to be most important, while 36%

rank it as important. Furthermore, 20% of respondents express a neutral stance on

this factor, with no respondents marking it as not at all important.

72

3.35 Attitude toward risk of salaried individuals?

Table 3.35 Representing attitude towards risk of salaried individuals

Particulars No of respondents Percentage

important 17 38

Most important 15 33

Neutral 9 9

Less important 2 2

No at all important 2 2

Total 45 100

38

33

9

2 2

Attitude towards risk of salaried individuals

important

Most important

Neutral

Less important

No at all important

INTERPRETATION:

From the data in the table, it's apparent that 38% of respondents prioritize attitude

towards risk, while 33% consider it important.

73

3.36 Which type of saving do you like?

Table 3.36 Representing the type of savings investors like

Saving type No of respondents Percentage

Gold 16 35

Life insurance 15 34

Bank deposit 9 20

Units of mutual funds 5 11

Total 45 100

35

34

20

11

Type of savings investors like

Gold

Life insurance

Bank deposit

Units of mutual funds

INTERPRETATION:

From the above table it is clear that the respondents, at 35% for both god and life

insurance as their preferred saving types, while bank deposits and units of

mutual funds are chosen by 20% and 11% of respondents, respectively.

74

3.37 Do you intend on investing soon?

Table 3.37 Representing the intent of investors in investing

Particulars No of respondents Percentage

Yes 16 35

No 8 18

May be 21 47

Total 45 100

35

18

47

Intent of Investors on investing

Yes

No

May be

INTERPRETATION:

From the above table it is clear that 35% of respondents answered “Yes’’ while

18% answered “No”, and 47% responded with “May be’’.

75

3.38 In which company’s mutual funds do you have invested in?

Table 3.38 Representing the companies that investors like to invest

Company’s mutual funds No of respondents Percentage

HDFC 17 38

SBI 21 47

ICICI 4 9

AXIS 3 7

Total 45 100

38

47

9

7

Companies that investors like to invest

HDFC

SBI

ICICI

AXIS

INTERPRETATION:

From the above table it is clear that SBI mutual funds are the most favored with

47% of respondents, followed by HDFC with 38%, ICICI and AXIS have

comparatively lower preferences at 9% and 7%, respectively.

76

3.39 Which features of the mutual funds allow you the most?

Table 3.39 Representing the features of mutual funds

Mutual fund features No of respondents Percentage

Diversification 19 42

Better return and safety 26 58

Total 45 100

42

58

Features of mutual funds

Diversification

Better return and safety

INTERPRETATION:

From the above table it is clear that 42% of respondents appreciate mutual funds

for their diversification, while a significant 58% prioritize them for the promise

of better returns and safety.

77

3.40 In which kind of mutual funds you would like to invest ?

Table 3.40 Representing the type of mutual funds the investor like to

invest

Particulars No of respondents Percentage

Public 31 69

private 14 31

Total 45 100

69

31

Type of Mutual funds preferred

Public

Private

INTERPRETATION:

From the above table it is clear that 69% of respondents belongs to public

institutions, while around 31% are affiliated with private entities.

78

3.41 If not invested in mutual fund, then why?

Table 3.41 Representing the reason for not investing in mutual funds

Particulars No of respondents Percentage

High risk 13 29

Not any specific reason 27 60

Not aware of mutual funds 5 11

Total 45 100

29

60

11

Reason for Not Investing

High risk

Not any specific reason

Not aware of mutual funds

INTERPRETATION:

From the above table is clear that the respondents, 29% cited high risk as a

reason for not investing in mutual funds, while an equal percentage of 60% did

not have any specific reason. Additionally, 11% stated they were not aware of

mutual funds.

79

3.42 Which AMC will you prefer to invest?

Table 3.42 Reprsenting which AMC will investors prefer

Particulars No of respondents Percentage

HDFC 18 40

SBI 20 44

ICICI 7 16

Total 45 100

40

44

16

Which AMC would investors prefer

HDFC

SBI

ICICI

INTERPRETATION:

From the above table it is clear that SBI is the most preferred bank among the

respondents with 44%, followed by HDFC with 40% , while ICICI has the least

preference at 16%.

80

4.1 FINDINGS

 BSLI EQUITY FUND earned highest average rate of return among all

the funds for 5 years and the next is SBI EQUITY FUND giving the next

highest average rate of return.

 From the above data it is found that BSLI EQUITY FUND has the

highest standard deviation i.e.,20.54 and the HDFC EQUITY FUND

Stands second having the next highest standard deviation i.e.,18.77.

 From the above data ,it is found that HSBC EQUITY FUND and AXIS

EQUITY FUND got the low beta value.

 BSLI EQUITY FUND got highest risk premium for each unit of risk

i.e.,4.09.

 The highest the Treynor Ratio value, better the fund is performing BSLI

EQUITY FUND i.e.,9.47 awarded as a first rank by calculation Treynor

performance.

 The higher the Sharpe ratio value, better the fund is performing BSLI

EQUITY FUND i.e.,0.73 awarded as first rank by calculating Sharpe

performance measure.

81

4.2 SUGGESTIONS

From the present study, it is suggested that investors may invest their funds in

the optimum portfolio to yield higher returns.

 BSLI Equity Fund Performs Best Over 5 Years: BSLI Equity Fund has

consistently delivered the highest average rate of return over a 5-year

period, making it a strong performer in the market.

 Standard Deviation Indicates Risk: BSLI Equity Fund also exhibits the

highest standard deviation, suggesting higher volatility or risk compared

to other funds. HDFC Equity Fund follows closely behind in terms of

risk.

 HSBC and AXIS Equity Funds Have Low Beta: Both HSBC Equity

Fund and AXIS Equity Fund have low beta values, indicating that they

are less sensitive to market fluctuations compared to other funds.

 BSLI Equity Fund Offers High Risk Premium: Despite its higher risk,

BSLI Equity Fund offers the highest risk premium for each unit of risk

taken, implying potentially higher returns for investors willing to tolerate

the increased volatility.

 Treynor Ratio and Sharpe Ratio Reflect Performance: BSLI Equity Fund

outperforms others in terms of Treynor Ratio and Sharpe Ratio,

indicating that it provides better returns relative to the risk taken, making

it a top choice for investors seeking optimal risk-adjusted returns.

4.3 CONCLUSION

82

Based on the comprehensive analysis of various equity funds, it's evident that

each fund demonstrates unique performance characteristics over the five-year

period. Birla Sun Life Equity Fund emerges as a standout performer, showcasing

the highest average rate of return and excelling in risk-adjusted metrics such as

the Treynor and Sharpe ratios. This indicates that not only has the fund delivered

strong returns but it has also managed risk effectively relative to the benchmark.

Following closely behind, AXIS Equity Fund demonstrates consistent

performance across multiple measures, particularly standing out with its high

risk-adjusted return and strong rankings in both Treynor and Sharpe ratios. On

the other hand, HSBC Equity Fund, while displaying relatively lower volatility

and risk, falls short in terms of both average return and risk-adjusted

performance compared to its peers. Despite its lower volatility, it hasn't

generated returns as robust as Birla Sun Life and AXIS Equity Funds. Therefore,

investors seeking higher returns may find Birla Sun Life and AXIS Equity Funds

more appealing options, while those prioritizing lower risk may opt for HSBC

Equity Fund. Ultimately, investors should carefully assess their risk tolerance,

investment objectives, and time horizon when selecting mutual funds to ensure

alignment with their financial goals and preferences. This analysis provides

valuable insights into the performance and risk profiles of the analyzed equity

funds, empowering investors to make well-informed investment decisions.

Understanding investor behavior, preferences, and barriers is crucial for mutual

fund companies and financial institutions to tailor their offerings and educational

initiatives effectively. Addressing concerns related to risk and enhancing

awareness could potentially encourage more individuals to participate in mutual

fund investments. Additionally, focusing on providing attractive returns and

safety features can help attract and retain investors in a competitive

market landscape.

Related documents

DOCX
Financial Inclusion and Banking for the Unbanked
Financial Inclusion and Banking for the Unbanked

4 pages

0% (0)
DOCX
Analysis of S&P 500 ETFs and US Market Sentiment
Analysis of S&P 500 ETFs and US Market Sentiment

2 pages

0% (0)
DOCX
Coffee Shack Financial Performance and Investment Appraisal
Coffee Shack Financial Performance and Investment Appraisal

15 pages

0% (0)
DOCX
Nasdaq Market View and Alphabet Portfolio Analysis
Nasdaq Market View and Alphabet Portfolio Analysis

9 pages

0% (0)
DOCX
Boubyan Bank Financial Health and Ratio Analysis
Boubyan Bank Financial Health and Ratio Analysis

6 pages

0% (0)
DOCX
Classic Bank Limited Five-Year Sustainable Finance Action Plan
Classic Bank Limited Five-Year Sustainable Finance Action Plan

2 pages

0% (0)
DOCX
The Impact of ESG Reporting on Financial Performance and Risk
The Impact of ESG Reporting on Financial Performance and Risk

4 pages

0% (0)
DOCX
Madoff Securities Audit and Fraud Prevention Report
Madoff Securities Audit and Fraud Prevention Report

2 pages

0% (0)
DOCX
Financial Performance of the Commonwealth Bank of Australia
Financial Performance of the Commonwealth Bank of Australia

2 pages

0% (0)
DOCX
Understanding Bond Investment: Features and Valuation
Understanding Bond Investment: Features and Valuation

4 pages

0% (0)