(Last Name) 1

Ojibwe: The Legend of the Dreamcatcher

An Ojibwe folktale called "The Legend of the Dreamcatcher " signifies the essence of safeguarding the deep-rooted indigenous culture. The folktale emphasizes the dreamcatcher holds a moral meaning that acts as a negativity blocker and a saviour if kept under the bed while sleeping.

The Dreamcatcher motivates the traditional customs and culture of the Ojibwe people’s way of life in a material form. They highly believed in encouraging the goodness of people fighting against the bad energy or influences present around them that kept their good dreams away through the help of Dreamcatcher.

Traditionally, the narrative of “first men” is believed to be the people who think of good and bad dreams, descended from the night sky. The Ojibwe people’s high feature of protecting each other ignited the safety net via Dreamcatchers where an Ojibwe woman wanted to protect her child from the nightmare he had been experiencing disturbing his sleep rooted in the creation of spider-webbed design of Dreamcatcher. It is believed that the Dreamcatcher attached to the cradle will drain all the negative thoughts and energy around her son and get spiralled into the web until the morning sun evaporates the energy away from her son. On the other hand, good dreams are centred on the web to the one sleeping beneath (Erwin et al.).

The Dreamcatcher is created in a way that incorporates eagle feathers, tingling beads, rocks, pine needles and slaying threads that capture the bad energy spiralled into the prime circle of the design. Inculcating the idea of Dreamcatchers into the culture and customs from ancient history stimulates a positive way to lead a life in both conscious and subconscious states with a touch of faith and hope knitted to human life.

(Hadjiyanni and Helle) explained the connective gifting that acted as the passage to circulate the customs and culture among the Ojibwe population. They highly practised the concept

of connective gifting and connective receiving of hand crafted gifts which personally ties the

relationship of the giver and receiver. The authors further detailed how Ojibwe people distinguish

themselves from the white people proudly expressing the family gifts preserved or displayed in

their homes, especially dreamcatchers hung in their rooms and halls as prizes possessions.

Further, the bloodstream of Ojibwe’s people till now revolves around the ideology of

protecting their identity and not letting go of the customs that save their ethnicity in the modern

world. The carrying of indigenous culture holds values in different forms for different sects of

humankind. Every modern trend is derived from the authentic custom that is adapted into new-age

practices now. (Antrop) suggested that the management and approaches in past cultural landscapes

and the active relations people entitle towards the understandable environment and the symbolic

value it engraves, provide insightful detailing for better sustainable management and planning for

future landscapes.

The Ojibwe’s Dreamcatchers is one of the greatest examples that brought back the

traditions as a commercialised product that was highly marketed in the 21st century. The artistic

descriptions of the product became a thought ful gift to the current generation that often remains

lost in connection to pathos, logos, and ethos. Ojibwe’s material culture withstood all these years

without compromising its truest sense and the ancestral notion of gifting requires high connectivity

of values of relationships. Acknowledging the contribution of Philip Jenkins, the regeneration of

Dreamcatchers in America, (Bogucka et al.) modernised the regeneration of Dreamcatchers among

Americans with association of Sleep scientists who research the notion that dreams are outcomes

of the walking lifestyle of people. The findings of the study enhanced 25% of the participants to

have an improved sleep cycle and enhanced connection with their waking life by equipping

Dreamcatchers into their life. The perceptive results do have a high impact on understanding the

gap between real life and dreaming where the sleeping mind is quantified with Ojibwe’s materialistic positive embedded mind tool.

Dreamcatchers have made an appreciation or appropriation to the new-age individuals and groups. Interestingly, art, culture, streamlining past into present is attained through school-teaching, it is prevalent that students from Art education are encouraged by teachers to engage in cultural artistic value-education. (Denmead) reported the teachers impact on involving indigenous artifacts into student life represented the anthropological understanding in the classrooms enhancing multicultural education among students.

With the long way of being from just an Ojibwe spirit tool of positivity to a polished peace-maker of the current generation, Dreamcatcher is an authentic practice that justified the sustainable revamping of human life via past to presence. It is a significant representation that conserving the indigenous cultural practices improves the present and future life ecosystems in a holistic way.

Regeneration of historic core cultures is the respect given to acknowledge the entertainment that the ancestors developed to sustain their hard lives to cope with oppression, or enjoy the differences they held. The reason to tap the customs in the modern age is to connect with each other. Humans' modern relationships of being connected or being online is not the exact representation of being present or active participation in life. The historical cultures drove humans to be naturally codependent on each other to share their lives in every twist and turn. For example, the reason to protect ethnicity or practices of ethnicity is togetherness, even the “thanksgiving” dinner is moreover a forced safety net that would bring families together with or without personal interest.

Therefore, custom based artifacts like Dreamcatchers need regenerative approaches to fit in a favorable diplomacy in current life to remember our roots.

Works Cited

Antrop, Marc. “Why Landscapes of the Past Are Important for the Future.” Landscape and Urban Planning, vol. 70, no. 1–2, Jan. 2005, pp. 21–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.10.002.

Denmead, Tyler. “Time After Whiteness: Performative Pedagogy and Temporal Subjectivities in Art Education.” Studies in Art Education, vol. 62, no. 2, Apr. 2021, pp. 130–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/00393541.2021.1896252.

Erwin, Barbara, Pat Smith Hopper, and Marcia Kauffman. “Integrating Art and Literature Through Multicultural Studies: Focusing on Native American Sioux Culture.” Reading Horizons: A Journal of Literacy and Language Arts, vol. 36, no. 5, 1 June 1996, scholarworks.wmich.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1328 context=reading_horizons.

E. P. Bogucka, B. A. Aseniero, L. M. Aiello and D. Quercia, “The Dreamcatcher: Interactive Storytelling of Dreams,” IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 105–112, 1 May-June 2021, doi: 10.1109/MCG.2021.3068794.

Hadjiyanni, Tasoulla, and Kristin Helle. “(IM)Materiality and Practice: Craft Making as a Medium for Reconstructing Ojibwe Identity in Domestic Spaces.” Home Cultures, vol. 7, no. 1, Mar. 2010, pp. 57–84. https://doi.org/10.2752/175174210X12572427063805.