Title: The TikTok Ban Debate: Balancing Security and Freedom of Expression
Introduction
Tik Tok, known by Zoomers as the major social media platform that carries short video
content, has now been put under the spotlight as the latest focal point of the American political
arena nowadays. The company ByteDance, with its high rate of growth, notably among younger
demographics, causes concern among the public in relation to ownership of this product. This kind
of dominance has raised concerns about whether the Chinese government could get Chinese
people's information through Byte Dance, which raises questions about privacy and national
security. In this article, different decisions that can be made regarding the activity of TikTok are
analyzed. This explores their own arguments as well as the intent of the opponents of the
application, proving that the security issues are indeed real, but freedom of speech, which should
be one of the foundation stones of any democratic society, should not be undermined by a complete
ban.
Any investigation of the mixed opinions on the TikTok band issue will not be complete
without taking into consideration the different views offered by different amendments. Fung,
Brian, in his article for CNN Business, introduces lawmakers' growth in issues concerning
TickTok's security threats. Drawing from her research, Anotita Kwande's article puts forward the
arguments about the pressures on freedom of speech that stem from a TikTok ban (Kwande). These
provide the necessary ammunition to prove either the ban or the non-ban case, and for both sides
of the divide, the arguments are reliably based on these sources.
Security Concerns: The TikTok supporters are saying that TikTok is an app that carries a
highly challenging danger. There are numerous verdicts when it comes to China's actions involving
TickTok's security threats. Drawing from her research, Anotita Kwande's article puts forward the
arguments about the pressures on freedom of speech that stem from a TikTok ban (Kwande). These
provide the necessary ammunition to prove either the ban or the non-ban case, and for both sides
of the divide, the arguments are reliably based on these sources.
Any investigation of the mixed opinions on the TikTok band issue will not be complete without taking into consideration the different views offered by different amendments. Fung, Brian, in his article for CNN Business, introduces lawmakers' growth in issues concerning TickTok's security threats. Drawing from her research, Anotita Kwande's article puts forward the arguments about the pressures on freedom of speech that stem from a TikTok ban (Kwande). These provide the necessary ammunition to prove either the ban or the non-ban case, and for both sides of the divide, the arguments are reliably based on these sources.
non-Chinese-owned companies that perhaps stole or spied on data. Fung covers the fact that the
U.S. lawmakers regard TikTok as a security threat because of its China origins and that the Chinese
state can use the platform as an instrument of espionage (Fung).
Freedom of Expression: The other side, moreover, argues that freedom of speech
provided in the First Amendment would be violated if the ban were put in place. Kwande dissects
the possible consequences of the banning of TikTok for the freedom of speech, demonstrating how
the authoritarian governments have the tendency of extending censorship to the online space.
Balanced Approach: In order to tackle these problems taking into account all aspects is
important. Though raising security concerns is justifiable, absolute prohibition of TikTok is not
the best of remedies. Other options to safeguard users data were available, working toward
increased transparency and overseeing TikTok's data practices could be recommended.
Counterargument
Others can arise from fears of TikTok with a higher risk of data breaches and intelligence,
these risks will simply exceed the value of freedom of expression (Fung, 2023). Some citizen
advocates may feel that it is more important to defend national security than to preserve a space
where one can be creative.
Rebuttal
The TikTok security vulnerabilities are manifest; however, the ban is subjected to
uncertainty, and an absolute ban might not be the best panacea (Kwande, 2023). Implementation
of restrictions on TikTok could lead to a situation where users move from one platform to another
while they present the same danger. A ban is not the solution. If instead, more stringent regulations
and monitoring mechanisms to secure freedom of expression are in place, fewer security threats
can be mitigated. Moreover, banning a single app like TikTok completely could be the beginning
of a dangerous scenario where the censorship of other online content would be a possibility, which
might restrict other fundamental rights. Consequently, finding a compromise that guarantees
security without allaying the fears of privacy is the demand of the hour.
Counterargument 1: Security Risks vs. Freedom of Expression
Some suggest freedom of expression is of no significance in the light of TikTok’s security
concerns (Fung, 2023). They claim that protecting national security should be more of a priority
than keeping the platform for creative expression.
Rebuttal 1:
While the security threats from TikTok are real, it is not necessary to modify the platform
as the total ban from use might not be effective (Kwande, 2023). Rather than banning such cars,
which is drastic, adopting stringent regulations and monitoring systems might be a more
appropriate decision. This method would provide an opportunity for the mitigation of security
dilemmas while still safeguarding the basic right of freedom of expression. In addition, to ban
TikTok outright is to set up a risky criterion for government censorship of the internet; hence, it is
an infringement of other vital freedoms. Consequently, a balanced strategy that deals with security
without infringing upon fundamental values must be adopted.
Counterargument 2: Whether bans make any difference or not.
Proponents of such a ban may argue that it may not be the solution to the underlying security issues, as the users might just migrate to other apps, which can be as dangerous as Tiktok.
As a result, it is likely that a ban will not be the most effective way to solve the issue of security; instead, there should be a balance between security needs and privacy rights.
Rebuttal 2:
The possibility of banning a TikTok does not completely eliminate security threats but it could be a nice move when dealing with these issues. The USA will explicitly convey to all other states and the tech firms that it aims to strengthen its legal and technical areas to ensure the security of the citizens. Further, the ban can thus be both influential and liberating, because the strict regulations and proper surveillance functions which are in turn developed can only benefit the whole of social networking sites also aid cybersecurity. Therefore, the administration may not feel comfortable with the prohibiton as a very efficient solution, but it is surely a loophole and what is more it is still a really important means in hands of the State to be protected as a sovereign nation.
Conclusion
Ultimately, the chairman about whether or not US should outlaw TikTok boils down to the confusing and multi-layered notions of freedom of speech and privacy. As a matter of fact, though
there are tangible reasons of censorship of TikTok, the proclamation of the complete ban on the app would be hazardous for the people's freedom and privacy.
Politicians might achieve this objective in another way by adopting a strategy that will recognize the necessity of security while not ignoring the right to free expression. For this purpose, we think that imposing even limits and supervision, aimed at guaranteeing the safety of your personal data, would be to the point. alongside this, we should make risky decisions to collaborate and aim to help implementing as well as enforcing the policies of the data collection and practices of TikTok and ByteDance.
Apart from that, the implication of the act itself would also not be certain as there could be other sites with similar risks if are online users would be, again, driven to other means. For this reason, the more complex and specialized policies should be devised to meet democratic principles and give the election, a very fine outcome.
Furthermore, it must be remembered that there is a limit to security and that once it jeopardizes the existing freedom, such an action shall not be accepted. State governors can create
a compromise that simultaneously articulates the principle of free expression and national security by doing a detailed analysis of the impact of TikTok ban and moreover, by looking for the ways to address security issues.
Striking a balance between the multiple contradicting opinions on the TikTok ban controversy including those related to disclosure of personal information, protecting the country, and artistic expression seems to be essential. Nevertheless, this app committed human rights freedom breach by forbidding freedom of speech; so, receiving confidential information risks through streaming of the program does not provide a reasonable ground for banning of the app. The fact that security breaches should be dealt with systematically without violating human rights can be achieved by adopting strict laws and surveillance policies like, tracking and location of specific individuals.
Fung, Brian. “Lawmakers Say TikTok Is a National Security Threat, but Evidence Remains Unclear | CNN Business.” CNN, 21 Mar. 2023, edition.cnn.com/2023/03/21/tech/tiktok-national-security-concerns/index.html.
Kwande, Anotida. “TikTok under Watch: A Look into the TikTok Ban and Its Implications on National Security and Free Speech.” Aura american.edu, 28 July 2023, https://doi.org/10.57912/23773785.v1.
Rinehart, William. “The Complex Case of TikTok in the United States.” The Center for Growth and Opportunity, 12 Feb. 2024.
[page-unreadable]