Is capitalism inherently exploitive?

Introduction

Capitalism, the financial system of almost all countries globally, has shaped our modern world for centuries. This system has been hailed as a mark of growth, innovation, and prosperity by the opponents of this economic system. However, this system has been equally criticized and deemed responsible for the birth of many economic, social, and political problems. This essay reviews relevant literature from reputed academic sources and critically analyzes capitalism to understand whether it is a catalyst for growth or exploitation using Marxist theory. Marxism asserts that many characteristics of capitalism make it fail to be an efficient system for promoting a just society. However, the advocates of capitalism opine that several elements of capitalist institutions are necessary for running the economy. Capitalism as an economic system has its disadvantages that may outweigh the advantages of this financial system, especially when adopted in developing or underdeveloped regions without proper contextualization. Reviewing the relevant literature, this essay concludes that some aspects of pure capitalism must be detrimental to the marginalized sectors of societies in modern economics. However, the Marxist rebuttal to this economic thought lacks the support to substantiate their claim of refuting capitalism.

This essay aims to critically analyze capitalism's exploitative characters through the prism of Marxist and Islamic economic theories to illuminate the processes responsible for the commodification of labor and the extraction of surplus value. First, the essay will explain capitalism as an economic system and then shed light on Marxist ideas pertinent to studying capitalism. After that, the essay will investigate how capitalist systems sustain exploitation via labor relations and market dynamics. Additionally, to establish the robustness of the thesis, the

essay shall respond to the many counterarguments presented and provide rebuttals. The essay encourages critical thinking on the ethical consequences of capitalism and argues for alternative models that prioritize social justice and human dignity.

As per the definition given by Adam Smith, the father of economics, capitalism is an economic system in which private actors have the right to own and control property based on their interests. In this system, the invisible hand of the pricing mechanism is believed to coordinate supply and demand in markets, automatically serving the best interests of society (Smith, 1776). From this perspective, the government's role often intervenes less in macroeconomic affairs (Friedman, 2017). From a capitalist point of view, the biggest problem for mankind is the scarcity of resources. This encompasses both natural and man-made resources.

Another fundamental characteristic of capitalism is that it is an economic system defined by private ownership of the means of production (Liu, Sakamoto, and Su, 2010). In this system, businesses aim to maximize profit (Friedman, 2017); competition is the most important factor since it determines the levels of output and the prices that consumers pay in a free market without any interference from the government. Pursuing self-interest is the primary motivation for capitalist businesses, with the amassing of profits being the ultimate objective (Friedman, 2017). From a capitalist point of view, the biggest problem for mankind is the scarcity of resources. This encompasses both natural and man-made resources.

According to Carroll and Wallerstein (1976), European capitalism was initiated during the sixteenth century. The cause of this evolution may be attributed to the crisis of feudalism that occurred in the 14th century. This evolution may have most probably been intensified by European problems, such as the weakening of land, which led to hunger, famines, and epidemics, such as the Black Death (Moore, 2002). Such issues sparked uprisings among European peasants and workers

during the 14th and 15th centuries. To different degrees, these rebellions managed to eliminate serfdom and gain sovereignty over communal lands (Wallerstein, 1976).

In the 16th century, the ruling class in Europe responded to the uprising of the ordinary people by compelling them to work for wages through the enclosure of land. They also reintroduced serfdom on export-oriented estates in Eastern Europe and expanded their military presence in the Americas to acquire inexpensive land and labor. The attempts to restore the influence of the upper class resulted in the establishment of a fresh economic framework centered around the global exchange of food, fuel, ships, and enslaved individuals across the Atlantic. This facilitated economic expansion in England, the Netherlands, and northern France (Wallerstein, 1976)

Karl Marx, a revolutionary socialist, economist, and philosopher, is regarded as one of the most prominent individuals in economic theory. Marx began his academic adventure in 1818 in Trier, Germany, to reshape our knowledge of many aspects of society, including economics, politics, and politics. Marx dug into the complexities of capitalism and its ramifications for human society in close collaboration with Friedrich Engels. Through foundational works like "The Communist Manifesto" and "Das Kapital," Marx established the framework for a critical study of the exploitation of capitalists and the struggle of different classes (Byron, no date).

Humans need material things to survive. These materials are of two kinds: the means of subsistence, like food and shelter, and the means of production, such as tools and equipment with which new subsistence materials can be made. Now, if we are lucky and have access to the means of production, we can produce the means of subsistence to fulfill our needs. Otherwise, we depend on others who have the means of production because having only the means of subsistence does

not guarantee the means of production. Marxism argues that the class that does not have the means of production has been exploited for their survival by the class that has access to those means. The basis of this communist economic approach to solving mankind's economic problems rested upon a shared responsibility for wealth creation. Nations like the USSR broadly adopted the theory after the Second World War, resulting in significant financial pressure during the Cold War. Weber believed capitalism led to a gap between the rich and the poor, but he considered this observation a financial advantage for maintaining market balances. Communism aims to create a shared society with common goals. This holds that societies must be ready to work together to solve everyday problems and achieve common goals (Marx, 1852). Karl Marx's criticism of capitalism was based on his principle that the system will eventually produce discord and contention among social strata, namely between the proletariat (working class) and the bourgeoisie (capitalist class). Marx contended that although some persons may make more effort than others, they often get compensation that needs to be adequate, resulting in disparities in wealth.

Advocates of capitalism assert that its growth has resulted in notable decreases in worldwide poverty, especially in developing nations (Dean, 2020). They highlight the growth of industrialization and globalization as proof of capitalism's ability to alleviate poverty by creating more economic opportunities and attracting investments.

Starting with the 16th century, Europe saw an increase in population while facing a decline in well-being and limited food availability. Nevertheless, it is crucial to realize this incident in the framework of the developing capitalist system. Instead of using the productive powers to fulfill the needs of the public, they were redirected towards the accumulation of riches by the privileged few. The land with the potential for agricultural agriculture was fenced and converted for other economic endeavors. In addition, the capitalist elites aimed to expand their workforce by enacting

pro-natalist government laws that restricted women from engaging in family planning (Moore, 2002).

Communism emphasizes shared community responsibility, unlike capitalism's individualistic approach toward attaining prosperity. In modern society, the proponents of communism see shared responsibility as a volunteer effort conducted by a collective of individuals cooperating to achieve a shared objective. Communists assert that shared efforts, focused upon common goals, are more efficient and reasonable than the individualistic approach held by the advocates of capitalism.

People's understanding of economic systems was substantially impacted by Marx's labor theory of value, which served as a foundational component of his criticism of capitalism. According to this idea, the quantity of work invested in a commodity's production is proportionate to the item's value. This concept was first supported by many nations, including the Soviet Union, Hungary, and Germany, with the expectation that it would result in significant economic expansion.

According to Fuchs-Schundeln and Schundeln (2020), Marxism was the driving force behind economic revolutions. These revolutions occurred in different regions of the globe as people tried to gain economic emancipation.

Marx believed that the labor theory of value could explain the value of all commodities. He regularly engaged in this line of reasoning to attack the fundamental assumptions of capitalism.

Even though Marx initially held that human nature has a singular capacity to transform the world, he eventually shifted his viewpoint due to integrating this concept with contemporary technology. He worried that technological progress would reach a point beyond human control.

A significant portion of Marx's criticism of capitalism was founded on the use of counter-theories to undermine the foundations of capitalism. Before several nations gained stability by adopting

one of these two economic mindsets or theories, the political and economic conflict between these two economic theories or mindsets lasted for years. In the contemporary world, nations continue to function according to the economic principles of either communism or capitalism. But if we investigate reality, more than ninety percent of the world's nations are immensely inspired and influenced by capitalism.

The means of production, which includes the resources, technology, and infrastructure required to create commodities and services, is at the core of Marxist intellectual thought (Halliday, 2008).

These resources are privately owned and controlled by the bourgeoisie, the capitalist class. The bourgeoisie is the group that extracts money from the proletariat's labor, also known as the working class (Jin, 2023). The fundamental difference in capitalist society between those who possess the means of production and those who sell their labor power is the foundation upon which class warfare is built.

Marxist theory holds that class struggle is how history is being shaped and views class conflict as a dialectical process in which opposing classes compete to control the means of production (Najafi, 2022). In a capitalist society, the bourgeoisie seeks to maintain power over the proletariat while increasing profits (Wright, 2000). However, the proletariat struggles for more pay, better working conditions, and overthrowing the capitalist system. The intrinsic tension between capital and labor has driven social upheaval and historical change (Di Muccio, 2015).

Labor exploitation is at the heart of capitalism. In this system, capitalists exploit workers by extracting surplus value to maximize profits (Yates, 2011). The Marxian perspective places a significant emphasis on this process, which serves as a scathing condemnation of the fundamental inequities maintained by capitalism. Workers sell their labor power to capitalists in exchange for

pay under the capitalist economic system. However, the value of labor power, defined by the cost of reproducing labor (that is, supplying workers with a means of sustenance), is often lower than the value that workers generate throughout the production process (Arnold, 2016). Because of this mismatch, capitalists can approximate surplus value, defined as the gap between the value of labor power and the value generated by work, as profit. Capitalists accomplish this by giving workers a wage that is lower than the whole worth of their labor, exploiting workers' labor to extract surplus value.

The exploitive character of capitalist labor relations is shown by many instances from actual life. For example, the garment sector is rife with sweatshops in developing nations (Sattinger and Botwinick, 1994). These sweatshops are places where workers are forced to suffer dangerous working conditions and pay that is below the poverty line to create apparel for Western markets (Loker and Rosen, 2004). Similarly, internet companies like Amazon have been criticized for their unrelenting pursuit of profit at the cost of worker wellbeing. There have been claims of arduous working hours, poor remuneration, and restricted job security (Yates, 2022). These instances illustrate the intrinsic exploitation incorporated throughout capitalist economies' production processes, highlighting the considerable differences in power and wealth between capitalists and workers inside such capitalist systems.

Marx's theory of alienation elucidates how capitalism production alienates workers from the results of their labor, the labor process itself, their fellow workers, and, finally, themselves. A fundamental estrangement from the creative nature of human work is represented by this alienation, which capitalist institutions maintain.

Workers are estranged from the results of their labor under capitalist production because capitalists

own and control the goods rather than the workers who make them. This causes workers to feel a

sense of disconnection from the products of their labor. Furthermore, workers are alienated from

the labor process due to the division of labor and automation inherent in capitalist production

processes. Therefore, workers are reduced to mere cogs in the capitalist mechanism. As rivalry

and individuality, encouraged by capitalism, weaken solidarity and collective awareness, this

alienation extends to workers' connections with their fellow workers. Workers are ultimately

estranged from themselves since their creative potential and human nature are subjected to capital

demands. This results in workers feeling alienated from themselves.

Advocates of capitalism assert that its growth has resulted in notable decreases in worldwide poverty, especially in developing nations. They highlight the growth of industrialization and globalization as proof of capitalism's ability to alleviate poverty by creating more economic opportunities and attracting investments.

Capitalism has the potential to bring economic growth, but it comes with disadvantages. We must examine the claimed reductions in poverty levels by capitalism by delving into comprehensive research studies on the impact of capitalism on the well-being of individuals in society. Poverty reduction initiatives fail to address the uneven distribution of wealth prevalent in capitalist systems (Khan, 2021). Moreover, when focusing on economic indicators, we must consider the broader aspects of poverty, such as access to healthcare, education, and social services. From a financial standpoint, it's clear that capitalism policies can contribute to the widening gap between the rich and the poor, perpetuating the cycle of poverty (Sattinger and Botwinick, 1994). This happens when the well-being of individuals is compromised over economic gain. So, while capitalism may

maximize wealth for a select few, it often does so at the expense of the most vulnerable individuals in society.

Capitalism is a system that rewards initiative and hard effort with material prosperity. The quantity of workers is less important than skill level when calculating labor productivity in capitalist systems. Capitalism has, so far, shown that it can increase worker productivity more effectively than communist theories. As a result, Marx's labor theory of value seems to have little bearing on the needs of the contemporary economy. This evaluation is backed by the fact that the theory was previously proven wrong during Marx's time when individuals recognized its limitations in producing high-quality goods. Consequently, nations that embraced private property ownership turned their backs on the economic revolution that started because of the notion. Since the labor theory of value has failed, it is fair to say that the persistence of economic disparities between social classes and capitalists allows capitalism to provide a win-win scenario in a market.

Capitalism's capacity to start and sustain continuous economic development has been further shown by applying other social theories to capitalist concepts. Theories like Maslow's hierarchy of needs, which encourages workers to be productive and creative, have provided theoretical support for the capitalist focus on individual laborers' hard effort and drive, in contrast to Marxism.

Organizations incentivize higher-quality work from their workers by providing them with prizes and incentives like promotions. Workers' intrinsic need for respect and acknowledgment is shown when Maslow's hierarchy of needs is applied to employee motivation. The fact that capitalism is compatible with many beliefs outside of economics is proof of the good that may emerge from it when implemented correctly. A free and fair market may benefit social classes and capitalists when capitalism theory's economic duties are adequately implemented.

The bourgeoisie's self-interest manipulation drives capitalism's exploitation. To understand exploitation in a capitalist society, one must go beyond transactions. The bourgeoisie (capitalists) and proletariat (workers) continually use the market to maximize product profits. The proletariat values items based on work, whereas the bourgeoisie sells at the most excellent price to maximize profits. The exploitation under capitalism is brutal to observe due to this dynamic. Karl Marx's thorough examination of capital-labor relations clarifies this problem. Marx's study of labor value shows that capitalist profits come from worker exploitation, not direct sales. Capitalists maximize worker surplus value throughout manufacturing. Thus, capitalist earnings are unaffected by market pricing or machinery's worth, which is negligible compared to human work. This shows that capitalists exploit workers by extracting excess labor value beyond wages. Capitalists earn more than the value of equipment and other capital inputs due to labor-centric exploitation. Thus, the worker is not merely a production input, but the primary resource capitalists exploit for profit.

Conclusion

With the help of Marxist theory and other relevant literature, this essay explains how capitalism leads to the exploitation of individuals in society. It discusses how capitalism generates surplus value, transforms labor into a product, and distances employees from their jobs. It brings attention to the disparities in wealth that exist in capitalist economies and demonstrates how exploitation is a necessary component of capitalism to maximize their wealth.

After critically analyzing both arguments, one can infer that Marx's claim on the exploitative character of capitalism needs to be supported by evidence since his labor theory of value, the bedrock of Marxism, was unsuccessful in gaining popularity decades ago. When contrasted with communist principles, capitalism thrives, especially regarding labor efficiency, which is integral to the economy's growth. However, the issue of exploitation and widening gap is still there between

the rich and marginalized people of the community who are often responsible for producing goods and services to obtain their means for subsistence.

References

Arnold, S. (2016) “Capitalism, Class Conflict, and Domination,” Socialism and Democracy, 31(1), pp. 106–124. doi: 10.1080/08854300.2016.1215810.

Bruff, I. (2011) “What about the Elephant in the Room? Varieties of Capitalism, Varieties in Capitalism,” New Political Economy, 16(4), pp. 481–500. doi: 10.1080/13563467.2011.519022.

Carroll, W. and Wallerstein, I. (1976) “The Modern World-System: Capitalist Agriculture and the Origins of the European World-Economy in the Sixteenth Century,” MERIP Reports, (52), p. 24. doi: 10.2307/3010968.

Crescioli, T. and Van Overbeke, T. (2024) “Rising Market Power and its Political Discontents,” SSRN Electronic Journal. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.4810762.

Di Muccio, E. (2015) “Theorising capitalist development, cooperation and working-class resistance on a global scale,” Capital & Class, 39(1), pp. 161–164. doi: 10.1177/0309816814564973a.

Fanshurna, T. (2022) “The Importance of Applying Maqashid al-Sharia in The Islamic Financial System,” Journal of Islamic Economics Perspectives, 4(1), pp. 1–8. doi: 10.35719/jiep.v4i1.58.

Halliday, T. (2008) “Migration, Risk and the Intra-Household Allocation of Labor in El Salvador,” SSRN Electronic Journal. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.1135898.

Jin, N. (2023) "The Cornerstone of Class Theory Today: Marx's Class Theory and Its Modern Applicability," Yixin Publisher, 1(2), pp. 1–8. doi: 10.59825/jhss.2023.1.2.1.

Kambali, M., Sholikhah, J. D. and Sandi, M. (2023) “Why Islamic Economics ? The Difference Between The Conventional System And The Islamic Economic System,” Al Iqtishod: Jurnal Pemikiran dan Penelitian Ekonomi Islam, 11(1), pp. 121–142. doi: 10.37812/aliqtishod.v11i1.835.

Khan, D. (2021) “Political Economy of Uneven State Spatiality: Conflict, Class, and Institutions in the Postcolonial State of Pakistan,” Rethinking Marxism, 33(1), pp. 52–70. doi: 10.1080/08935696.2020.1847016.

Loker, S. and Rosen, E. I. (2004) “Making Sweatshops: The Globalization of the U.S. Apparel Industry,” Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 57(2), p. 312. doi: 10.2307/4126628.

Moore, J. W. (2002) “The Crisis of Feudalism,” Organization & Environment, 15(3), pp. 301–322. doi: 10.1177/1086026602153008.

Najafi, Z. (2022) “Dialectical relation of temporal domination and class exploitation in Marx's value theory,” Capital & Class, 47(4), pp. 519–537. doi: 10.1177/03098168221114376.

Pryor, F. L. (1985) “The islamic economic system,” Journal of Comparative Economics, 9(2), pp. 197–223. doi: 10.1016/0147-5967(85)90039-3.

Rai, D. (2022) “Islamic Economics and Finance as an Alternative for the Current Economic System in the Context of Covid-19,” Journal of Islamic Economics and Philanthropy, 5(4), p. 245. doi: 10.21111/jiep.v5i4.7395.

Sattinger, M. and Botwinick, H. (1994) “Persistent Inequalities: Wage Disparity under Capitalist Competition.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 48(1), p. 168. doi: 10.2307/2524633.

Samad, T. F. D. (2021) “The Role Of Islamic Economic System In Tackling Various Economic Issues,” Maqrizi: Journal of Economics and Islamic Economics, 1(2), pp. 14–23. doi: 10.30984/maqriziv1i2.122.

Smith, A. (1776) An Inquiry Into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. Available at: http://books.google.ie/books?id=C5dNAAAACAAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=Wealth+of+Nations&hl=&cd=1&source=gbs_api.

Yates, M. (2022) Work Work Work. NYU Press. Available at: http://books.google.ie/books?id=rG5IEAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=Work+work+work:+Labor,+alienation,+and+class+struggle&hl=&cd=1&source=gbs_api.

Rikap, C. (2021) Capitalism, Power and Innovation. Routledge. Available at: http://books.google.ie/books?id=TFsXEAQQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=Capitalism,+power+and+innovation:+Intellectual+monopoly+capitalism+uncovered&hl=&cd=1&source=gbs_api.

[page-unreadable]