1

The importance of Media Framing in Shaping Public Perception of Crime

Student’s Name

Institutional Affiliation

Course Name & Number

Instructor’s Name

Submission Date

2

The importance of Media Framing in Shaping Public Perception of Crime

Media frame is a fundamental factor when it comes to shaping public mood and knowledge concerning crime. The manner in which crime related stories are presented on the social media and the media, leaves a significant impression on the way the general public would think and understand crime. For instance, the media stories form the context into which other people imagine the events, learn about the suspects, witnesses, crime and justice. Media tend to prioritize some details and not cover others. The selective presentation forms differences in the public’s understanding, views and impressions regarding a particular criminal instance. This report constitutes the analysis of the way three different news media outlets demonstrate a specific crime event, looking at the different approaches they make and the possible effect on public discussion.

The first article is “What we know about Buffalo supermarket shooter Payton Grendon” written by CNN which provides the public a vivid account of the incident, further contributing to the perception that the event was bold and ruthless. The author explains that mass shootings are a substantial risk because of the number of casualties and the fact that the shooter is captured quickly. The use of quotations from police officers and eyewitnesses personalizes the story and provides the readers with an emotional connection to the victims and the community affected by the shooting. On the other hand, readers might not get an in-depth analysis of the suspect's background and motives to find the leading cause of mass shootings and believe these factors on their own. Insufficient discussion of the problem in terms of mental health, gun The lack of a broader frame of reference in the article could also lead to the public being unable to understand the intricacies of mass shootings and the difficulties in preventing them

3

completely. While focusing mainly on the event’s details, the article might inadvertently

provide a simplistic view of crime as a one-time incident, rather than a symptom of a wider

social concern. Nevertheless, the article's neutrality, which is an element of the objective

journalism is not the most effective tool to make people question the reasons of mass

shooting or to consider viable solutions. The absence of a more sophisticated discussion can

push the public into a position of being informed about the particular incident but not how to

deal with the more complicated issue of gun violence in the entire society.

The Guardian article "Buffalo shooting" uses an emotional and community-based approach in

framing the criminal event, which shapes the way audience not only comprehend and

understand the tragedy in a different perspective but also empathize with the victims and the

impacted community. This narrative invites the readers not to see the crime as a single

isolated event but as a collective traumatic condition that has wide-reaching ripple-effects on

everyone concerned. These first-hand accounts assist in humanizing the victims and hence

cause a feeling of shared grief and loss among readers and make people sympathetic and

understand the people who were actually victimized.

Through depicting how the community responded to the tragedy including vigils,

memorials and even election campaigns, the article is a portrayal of the event as the genesis of a

collective sadness and a cry for change. This technique could make it possible for readers to

view the crime as not an isolated case of violence but rather an indication of deeper societal

problems that must be tackled. The Guardian could provide more information about the

community where the crime took place, including its history, demographics, and previous

violent acts. This backdrop may show the against society and history, revealing the possible

causes of the shooting, like poverty, inequality, and mental health problems. On the one hand,

4

emotional framing in the article could be a limitation in terms of formation of public opinion regarding the crime, to be more exact. By emphasizing heavily on the disturbance of the community's grief and shock, it may not be able to dig deeper into the precise details of the shooting and the investigation, depriving the readers of a more detailed and thorough comprehension of the facts.

The Fox News story "Buffalo shooting suspect made threat in 2021, underwent mental health evaluation" tries a different technique of framing than the previous two articles by looking into the background of the suspect and the potential warning signs that led to the shooting.

This article instead directs attention over to the shooter's social media history, so the victims and the community take a backseat. This is how public perception of the crime is shaped to believe that the shooting could have been avoided had there been response to the warning signs. This casting could cause the readers to wonder whether the authorities or social media platforms took significant measures to intervene before the shooting occurred.

The article gives out a detailed description of troubling posts made by the suspect, which may contain anger, isolation, or extreme views. Through this identification of the warning signs, the article depicts shooter as a person who has a past history of abnormal behavior, rather than a random act of violence. This approach might lead to general opinion of the crime as the outcome of an individual's actions and psychological state rather than the social problem on the larger level.

Nevertheless, the attention paid to the shooter's social media posts may give rise to a more sensationalized characterization of the crime, with less priority on the victims and the community's grief, respectively. Such framing is likely to produce a bizarre [part-unreadable].

5

about the killer's motives and biography, rather than drawing attention to the human aspect of the tragedy.

The issue in the article of identifying signs may possibly give rise to a public debate about the role of the social networks in finding possible threats and the difficulty of balancing freedom of speech and public security issues. Such framing could lead to public perception of the crime as a part of a wider debate about the role of technology companies and need for tools better suited to detect and prevent violence.

Lastly, the three articles examined here reveals that media framing can very susceptibly alter the publics views and comprehension of a critical crime situation such as a supermarket shooting. Every article on the sad incident is unique in the way it looks at the event by highlighting the specific issues and downplaying others, thus, readers understand the story differently. Finally, these different frames highlight the importance of critical media consumption and the need for multisourcing to gain a deep understanding of criminal events.

Realizing the power of the media frame on the formation of a public opinion enables readers to become more informed and involved, able to join discussions about public safety, gun violence prevention, and complicated social issues that contribute to such incidents.

References

What we Know about Buffalo supermarket shooting suspect Payton Grendon, CNN.

https://edition.cnn.com/2022/05/15/us/payton-gendron-buffalo-shooting-suspect-what-we-know/index.html

Buffalo Shooting, The Guardian. 2022.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/buffalo-shooting

Buffalo shooting suspect allegedly made threat in 2021, underwent mental health evaluation.

https://www.foxnews.com/us/buffalo-shooting-suspect-payton-gendron-threat-school-mental-health